Inter-Institutional Faculty Senate
Western Oregon University Monmouth, OR
February 6-7
Present:
Solveig Holmquist
and Bob Turner, WOU
Mina Carson, Dan
Edge, and Kelvin Koong,OSU
Jim Tooke and
Steve Tanner, EOU
Peter Gilkey and
Nathan Tublitz, UO
Marye Hefty and
Maureen Sevigney, OIT
Marny Rivera and
Laura Jones, SOU
Steve Teich, OHSU
Craig Wollner,
Scott Burns, and Robert Mercer, PSU
Guests:
John Minahan, WOU
Provost
Bill Linden, AOF
MardiLyn Saathoff,
General counsel and Higher Ed Policy Advisor to
Governor
Richard Jarvis,
Chancellor
Peter Courtney,
President, OR Senate
Phil Conn, WOU
President
Denise Yunker, OUS
Human Resources
Tim Young, IFS
intern
Provost
Minahan:
Provost Minahan
spoke about the difficulty of dealing with the drastic budget cuts that have
beset Oregon. More fund-raising is
needed, yet that is a skill more common to administrators in private, rather
than public, institutions.
Articulations with
CC’s will be put in place, but there is an inherent downside: students
are then more likely to take courses at the CC’s rather than at the
4-year institutions.
WOU has decided
not to pursue distance learning; the student base is mostly residential and
commuter. Western is pursuing
out-of-state students and international students. To aid retention, Western has block programmed the freshman
orientation class, allowing students to choose blocks that keep them with
like-minded (regarding professional goals) peers.
WOU closed a union
contract 2 weeks ago. Faculty
froze their salaries for 2 years.
WOU moved the savings into release time for research.
Bill Linden,
AOF attorney
Bill gave an
update on litigation between OUS and AOF.
State will claim necessity of reducing contribution; ORP maintains that
a contract must be honored. State
has filed a motion for summary judgment.
It was noted that
the ORP situation is precipitating departure of some faculty, and that it is
difficult to get faculty of the same quality due to the instability in the
benefits situation (coupled with the ever-low salaries).
Details on the ORP
situation can be found at http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~ifs/dirORP/7Feb04.html
MardiLyn
Saathoff, Higher Education Policy Advisor to the Governor
Her role: Gather
info from community stakeholders, figure out policy issues and choices, and
advise the governor. Gov. is
sincere in wanting to turn the current disinvestments in HE around. The four “silos” under
which efforts of new state board will be directed: Targeting state dollars for
economic development, strategies for reinvestment, access, excellence.
$7.5 million has
been disappropriated; the distribution to be based on UG enrollment.
$14 M “tax on tuition” that must
be returned to GF. If we
don’t cut that $14 M, govt will take it out of GF. (This refers to the implied
"PERS savings" that must
be returned to the state general fund in January 2005, as is currently required
by legislative act).
MardiLyn strongly
advocated more personal relationships with legislators.
We need to be able
to articulate financial info to the legislature clearly and succinctly. HE’s financial structure is not
compatible with how state structures its budget. Board is working with the legislature to align budgeting
with times when universities have new budget information (e.g., new enrollment
figures).
Only two places
Gov. can get money for HE: ask for money from the Board, or move money from
somewhere else.
Bond money can
only be RQ for deferred maintenance or new builds.
Peter Courtney
The 17 Community
Colleges will become even more significant as feeder schools for the
universities. Suggestion:
universities should closely align with one or more CC’s.
Legislative branch
of government is no longer equal in power to the other 2 branches, judiciary
and executive. It cannot
“save” higher education. Oregon legislature cannot change the OR
tax structure. Oregon leads the
nation in initiative recall.
Fund-raising is
absolutely necessary. Get involved
in local government—city council, school board, advisory groups to local
government. Legislators want to
know that faculty are concerned about community life. HE needs to be identified as being involved with local
government, and needs to be seen as a cohesive team.
Chancellor
Jarvis
Re: the $7.5M
designated to come from UG education: Gov says no tuition increase—take the money from
administrative services.
If tuition
can’t be raised, the only place to get money is from the admin.
structure. Chancellor’s
office has $10M per year budget.
Board will be examining C’s office and make recommendations for
cuts within 3 months.
Gov has articulated several directives:
1. C’s office—downsize,
outsource.
2. Increase
competitiveness (with other public services) in the legislature—more
sophisticated, more effective.
Neil G. will increase the professionalism of the HE political process.
3. Much closer relationship with
CC’s on all dimensions—use of facilities, articulations.
All HE in OUS will
take a beating re: graduation rates.
Funding financial
aid to maintain access is a high priority. We need money in a dedicated revenue source.
We have been
unable to get money from legislature for deferred maintenance. Over 80% of buildings in OUS fall below
“acceptable” levels of maintenance. And we have only $11M to deal with this (for whole
system). Any bond we would
generate must be able to stand initiative for recall.
IFS members were
encouraged to connect with Board members in whatever ways possible. Absent a radical change in approach and
positioning, there’s no reason that the prop 30 situation won’t
happen again.
There is concern
among some politicians about the morality of fee remissions: that it’s
wrong to take money from one student to lighten load of another student.
Board members feel
that they are taking on the state’s biggest problem, and they are
motivated to address this. We need
to let the new members know that we appreciate their strengths and motivation,
and respectfully acculturate them.
Saturday
Schedule changes:
April 9-10 @UO
June 4-5 meeting @SOU
Several senators
reiterated the need for personal contact with the Board and legislators, and
involvement with our communities in order to keep value of HE on the radar
screen. It was noted that people
support CC’s with bonds because the CC’s are perceived as arising
from the community.
Campus reports:
EOU: New (interim)
pres, encouraging grants. Provost
in second year. Stress between
union and administration.
OIT: All depts. taking 10% cut. Some of the money will be used for
professional development—this has increased morale. Proposed center for health
professionals.
OHSU: Failure of prop 30 will have large
negative effects on OHP and hospitals as well as HE per se. The internet filters have been removed
and appropriate research activities can proceed unhindered.
PSU: New VPfor
Development. All new buildings
will have commercial space on ground floor. PSU will move increasingly to revenue from commercial
leasing. All new buildings are
“green”—eco-friendly.
New engineering building.
Much networking with CC’s.
Noted that although there is common numbering across the state for many
courses, the contents have changed over the years. Perhaps it’s time to re-visit the numbering and
content.
Also, PSU has
developed a process that allows students to do an automated degree audit. A potential transfer student can also
log onto the PSU site and get a degree audit.
WOU: Provost
search to replace Minahan, who’s leaving end of spring term. Contract: no raises, one-time incentive
of $350, step increases; move up a step but no increase in salary. There is a leave bank for sick
leave—other campuses have this too?
Registrar search has been going on for 2 years. Alumni director search also.
Time ran out and
the reports of UO and OSU were postponed until the April meeting of the IFS.
SOU: Many departments have submitted invited
initiatives to the Provost; three will be chosen for funding. New library will be dedicated to Len
Hannon. Association for
Experiential Education Northwest District conference to be held on campus March
26-28.
Dr. Phil Conn,
President, WOU
Union contract
negotiations settled. Preserved
concept (not money) of step system.
More money in professional development and release time. Regarding reducing Chancellor’s
office: Will this save a significant amount of money? Not if schools have to take over the eliminated tasks
themselves. The smaller
institutions, especially, may be hurt by reductions in Chancellor’s
staff.
WOU preparing to
publish budget book that lists, by name, salaries and other budget info; the
book will be available to anyone who wants it.
Denise Yunker
A summary of the
materials discussed relating to PERS and ORP has been posted on the web:
http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~ifs/dirORP/dirORP/7Feb04.html
For those who are
over 40 and plan to work for at least 15 years, PERS is best
choice—understood, and TIAA-CREF so advises. Otherwise, ORP may be best. The institutional vendors for the various plans know the
particulars of these situations.
Production of
Briefing Book
Craig used the
Metropolitan Briefing Book, a PSU-initiated tool for elected officials, as a
model of what an OUS briefing book for legislators might look like. The
critical issues list comes from focus groups—what are the 10 most
critical, and how should they be ordered?
Remainder of articles are those that OUS cares deeply about. Audience: legislators, other interested
parties (e.g., AOF, IFS, AAUP, presidents, provosts, press), anyone interested
in legislation and policy. There
was general agreement that the book could be organized per Gov’s four
initiatives—access, quality, econ. dev., and reinvestment . Tim Young (IFS intern) will assist with
gathering info. Craig will chair
committee to produce the book. The
final document will be ratified by the various faculty senates.
Respectfully
submitted,
Laura Jones,
Secretary