HC 221 H, Honors College World Literature, TIPS FOR TOPICS (with thanks to Prof. Jim Earl)
When you don't have an earth-shaking brainstorm for a paper topic, you can fall back on the following advice. It is always worthwhile to practice straightforward literary observation, description, and analysis. When done well, this sort of paper is worth a lot more than heavy theorizing done less well.
Describe in literary terms some of the features of the text. Take at least two passages, one or both from one assigned text or passages from two different texts, and compare them critically. Be sure to state a thesis and demonstrate it, drawing clear conclusions from textual evidence. Don't overstate your case, but try to say something interesting, original and memorable. After reading your paper, I should be able to summarize your point in a sentence or two.
Try to make firm generalizations about your texts, regarding one or two of the following literary concepts:
 Narrative style and characterization Is 
  the story told chronologically? Are there digressions? Are the characters' thoughts 
  and feelings reported, or only their actions and speech?
  Dialogue and rhetoric Is the text repetitive, 
  formal, ritualistic? Is it conversational, or do characters make long speeches? 
  Do different characters have distinctive styles of speech? Is there dramatic 
  irony--characters not knowing important information the reader knows?
  High and low style Are the lives of ordinary 
  people represented? Is there attention to everyday activities like eating or 
  sleeping? Is humor or comedy included for its own sake?
  Imagery, allegory and symbolism Is the 
  narrative "realistic," or do you feel the characters and events mean 
  something beyond themselves? Does the writer use images consistently, to color, 
  intensify, undermine or unify the narrative? Are characters aware of their own 
  symbolism, or are they part of a drama they don't know about or understand?
  Time, causality and pattern Why do events 
  happen? Is the plot driven by plausible cause and effect? Does time move in 
  a linear or cyclical way? Are events unique, or patterned, or repeating?
  Anticipation and suspense Does the author 
  control our responses by stretching out the story to delay the outcome, or withhold 
  crucial information from us?
  Chance, accident and fate Do things happen 
  by chance, divine intervention, or fated outcome?
  Repetition, variation and paradox These 
  are useful literary devices for structuring a narrative, making things refer 
  to each other, creating sense or confusion
  Prose and poetry How do we read a poetic 
  narrative differently than one written in prose? What are the principles of 
  poetry? When and why does an author use poetry?
  Myth, folklore, fiction and history These 
  are major modalities of narrative writing, sometimes mixed, often confused by 
  readers. Is the narrative based on oral traditions? Is it serving religious 
  practice, or is it for entertainment? Is it faithful to modern notions of historical 
  veracity) 
  Understatement, irony and humor Why would 
  authors or characters distort their language or tone in these ways? When what 
  they say isn't what they mean, how can you tell what they mean?
  Emotion, motivation and psychology Does 
  the author look inside characters to portray their emotions, or does he/she 
  only represent behavior and speech? What motivates the characters' behavior, 
  and how do you know? How is their psychology different than our own?
  Morality and teaching Some narratives are 
  organized largely or solely to illustrate a point or teach a lesson. How can 
  you tell if this is the case? And what is the lesson or lessons?
  Mood, tone and narrative voice Always pay 
  attention to the voice of the narrator, even when the narrator is trying to 
  remain invisible. Does he/she pass judgments on the action, editorialize, draw 
  your attention to certain things, preach? Is the tone didactic, pessimistic, 
  anxious, self-righteous, whimsical?
  Author and audience Who is the author, 
  and what stake does he/she have in the story? What audience was he/she aiming 
  the narrative at? How do these facts affect our reading?
  Historical setting and point of view Literary 
  history is an aspect of political/social history, and the more you know about 
  the setting the better; within this setting, what is the author's or narrator's 
  position? Does he/she have an attitude about the action and the characters?
  Genre and intention Literary texts come 
  in types: epic, romance, song, chronicle, liturgy, philosophical discourse, wisdom, 
  aphorism, story. What are the set features of the genre you are reading, and 
  how do they affect our interpretation?
  Unity and coherence Is the story coherent 
  and unified? Are there extraneous details, confusing digressions, inconsistencies 
  that point to the narrator's attempt to bring disparate traditions together? 
  Are the author's ideas of unity and coherence the same as ours?
  Artistry and aesthetics Is the work beautiful? 
  What does that mean? Is the author a good literary artist? Did ancient cultures 
  have their own notions of beauty?
  Gender and ideology How does the work portray 
  women and men differently? What gender roles are being endorsed or undermined 
  by the text? What social-political values and institutions does the work represent, 
  embody, endorse, or critique?
  The limits of representation and reader response 
  How does the author manipulate our responses to the work? Does the work provoke 
  anger, sympathy, anxiety, confusion, eroticism, meditation? How and why? Are 
  our responses appropriate? Does the work get under our skin? Does it mean to, 
  or is it our problem?
  Difficulties and appropriate methods of interpretation 
  Are there points in the narrative where the meaning of the whole 
  seems to hinge on some small detail? Is there a point where your understanding 
  fails? Are their specific critical responses that are called for?
There's a lot here, but this is not a complete list of possibilities, only a reminder of what kinds of literary categories can help focus your thoughts. Whatever you do, do not try to discuss all these issues! Focus on just one or two features, and on no more than two passages.
Always illustrate general statements with particular passages. Do not just state opinions, but make clear judgments about the text based on the text. Comparisons between literary texts are often useful and clarifying--and might even be the point of the paper. I'll let you know when library research is required, but learning as much as you can about your topic never hurts. Make a point to cite in your paper the supplementary reading, including Web reading, that you have done.
Remember: good literary criticism always focuses on the text. Quote your text often but succinctly, to prove or illustrate your points. The smaller the unit you focus on, the more likely you will draw solid conclusions in the short space required. For example, don't choose a whole table of Gilgamesh, but an episode like Enkidu's death. Don't ask, What makes Job suffer? Ask rather, What are the metaphors Job uses to express his wish never to have been born, and why use those particular ones? Be specific.
  Back to top of page | Back 
  to Bishop Home Page | This page created by Louise 
      M. Bishop | Last updated 16 September 2012