Fairness in Testing Publications

  1. Code of Fair Testing Practices in Education (2004) prepared by the Joint Committee on Testing Practices
  2. Aronson, J., M.J. Lustina, C. Good, K. Keough, C.M. Steele and J. Brown, When White Men Can't Do Math: Necessary and Sufficient Factors in Stereotype Threat, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 35,(1999), 29-46.
    (abstract)
  3. Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., Master, A., Reducing the racial achievement gap: a social-psychological intervention, Science (journal) 313 (5791)(September 2006), 1307-1310.
    (abstract)
  4. Dar-Nimrod, I. and Heine, S. J., Exposure to Scientific Theories Affects Women’s Math Performance, Science 20 October 2006: Vol. 314. no. 5798, p. 435
    (abstract)
  5. C. Goldin and C. Rouse, Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians, The American Economic Review, 90 no. 4 (2000), 715-741.
    (abstract)
  6. Gonzales, P.M., Blanton, H., and Williams, K.J. The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28 (2002), 659-670.
    (abstract)
  7. Keller, J., Blatant Stereotype threat and women’s math performance: Self-handicapping as a strategic means to cope with obtrusive negative performance expectations. Sex Roles, 47 (2002), 193-198.
    (abstract)
  8. Keller, J. & Dauenheimer, D., Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting threat effect on women’s math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (2003), 371-381.
    (abstract)
  9. Linn, M. and Kessel, C., Test bias, In Judith Worrell (Editor in Chief), Encyclopedia of Women and Gender Academic Press, (2001), 1129-1140.
    Download pdf file
  10. Linn, M. and Kessel, C., Gender and assessment, In Carol Goodheart & Judith Worell (Eds.), Handbook of girls’ and women's psychological health: Gender and well-being across the life span. New York: Oxford University Press, (2005).
    Download pdf file
  11. Martensa, A., Johnsa, M. Greenberga, J., and Schimelb, J., Combating stereotype threat: The effect of self-affirmation on women’s intellectual performance, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 42, Issue 2 (2005), pp. 236-243
    (abstract)
  12. McCornack, R.L., McLeod, M.M., Gender Bias in the Prediction of College Course Performance, Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol. 25, No. 4 (1988) pp. 321-331.
    (abstract)
  13. Shepard, L. , Camilli, G. , & Averill, M., Comparison of procedures for detecting test-item bias with both internal and external ability criteria, Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(4) (1981), 317-375.
    (abstract)
  14. Shepard, L., Camilli, G., & Williams, D., Accounting for statistical artifacts in item bias research. Journal of Educational Statistics, 9(2) (1984), 93-128.
    (abstract)
  15. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T.L., & Ambady, Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance, N., Psychological Science, Vol. 10, No. 1 (1999), pp. 80-83.
    (abstract)
  16. Spencer, S.J., Steele, C.M., & Quinn, D.M. Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35 (1999) 4 - 28.
    (abstract)
  17. Steele, C.M., & Aronson, J. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (1995), 797-811.
    (abstract)
  18. Walton, G. M. and Cohen, G. L., Stereotype Lift, J. of Experimental Social Psychology, 39 (2003), 456-467.
    (abstract)     Download pdf file
  19. Walton, G. M. and Spencer, S. J., Latent Ability: Grades and Test Scores Systematically Underestimate the Intellectual Ability of Negatively Stereotyped Students, Psychological Science 20 no. 9 (2009), 1132-1139.
    (abstract)     Download pdf file