In last week's lecture presentations we focused on the effects of
corporate control of the media ('media monopoly' and the 'propaganda
model'). In addition, we examined the effects of advertising on our
society and the way in which advertising promotes immense commodity
accumulation. Both of these presentations, and the critics whose ideas
the presentations were based upon, were highly critical of the state
of the media today. If one just focused on these criticisms, one would
come away feeling as the media situation we are now in is bleak and very one-sided. In
this week's presentations we will focus on more positive and different aspects of the media.
These aspects are the ways in which individuals, smaller companies, and non-profits
are utilizing both the mass media structures and mass media imagery
to promote democratic values at the level of the general public. At the same time we need to keep in mind that these other outlets have their own problems.
The presentation below is a companion piece to the one about Personal
Impact Assessment (PIA). This presentation is about what others are
doing to take back the mass media and the visual images produced by
it, and the PIA lecture is about what you can do to take it back at
a personal level.
It is my hope that you are intrigued by the materials presented in
this week's lectures, and I hope you will share your thoughts and other
examples in our discussion this week.
"The airwaves do not belong to the broadcasters. They do not
belong to the advertisers. The owners, by law, are the people of the
United States" (Bagdikian, (2000). The media monopoly.
(6th ed.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. p. 252).
APPROPRIATION = CRITICAL ANALYSIS of the MEDIA
-
Appropriation is often thought of in a negative light. But by utilizing
elements of the mass media to allow for independent voices to be
heard (on whatever political or ideological platform), appropriation
takes back what was ours to start with - the public airwaves.
-
Appropriation, according to the The American Heritage Dictionary's
definition, is neutral, in that appropriation means to "to
set apart for a specific use" or "take possession of."
Individuals who appropriate the mass media models and images are
very mass media and visually literate. Due to this high level of
literacy they take the corporate models and images and are able
to create new forms of media and visual communication.
-
Below are some examples of images that either directly appropriate
images from the media, such as Adbusters which uses the exact look
of advertisements to create anti-consumer messages. Another example
is the Guerrilla Girls who started in the 1980s using the look of
graphic advertisements to critique sexism found in the art world,
later they branched out to critique the general role of women in
society.
|
INDEPENDENT (or at least non-network) MEDIA OUTLETS
In the presentation on the 'media monopoly' and 'propaganda model',
we examined the ways in which six large media corporations control much
of the media we are exposed to. This is a very important and serious
issue to address when discussing media literacy because of the effects
of media produced images and narratives on individuals and society.
But there are media outlets that are not controlled by this 'media
monopoly' structure. Many of the more balanced news agencies are international,
but there are some in the United States. Indeed many of the alternative
media sources in the Untied States are organizations created to offer
both alternatives to and criticisms of the media model now in place.
The general public in the United States has received little information
either from political debates over broadcasting or from their major
media about differing broadcast models in Canada, Britain, the Scandinavian
countries, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, Japan, and other developed
democracies. None of those foreign systems is exactly the same, but
they all provide public access to civic groups with large memberships,
and they are usually operated by quasi-trusteeships, supported by
financing from fixed taxes.
In Belgium and the Netherlands, for example, civic and other organizations,
including "listener associations," have guaranteed access
to broadcast time based on the size of their memberships.
Within the United States, major foundations, consumer advocates
like Ralph Nader, and others have suggested alternatives to the two-model
illusion of choice. They have demonstrated, often with carefully evolved
plans, that there are tax-supported alternatives appropriate to the
United States. (The "two-model illusion of choice" is when
the debate revolves around only two arguments: 1) government controlled
media becomes undiluted propaganda when tax dollars are used, and
2) the only and best alternative becomes a total commercial model
of media control. This then leaves out of the debate the public who
wants a balanced approach because the corporate model does not give
us the amount of choice it pretends to offer.)
The struggling alternative stations (and the illegal pirate ones)
remain lonely voices against the national silence on the many ways
broadcasting could develop if we do not have to limit ourselves to
choosing between broadcasting the is governmental propaganda and broadcasting
as a product designed for maximized corporate profit making. (Bagdikian,
pp. 250 - 251.)
Some examples (click on the logos to see the web pages,
and they can be found in this week's 'External Links'):


DIY CULTURE (Do It Yourself)
"DIY stands for: Do It Yourself and it describes
an ethic and a community. The ethic is one of not needing the assistance
of a large company of producing a service or a product. The ethic
is about being able to stand on your own two feet, its about developing
your own ideas and carrying them out, without the backing of a corporation.
The community is built up of those who believe in DIY. Those people
who would rather produce their own "thing" without going
and getting help from big business. The whole idea is, that once
big business is involved, that the original creator of the "thing"
is cut out of the creative process, and thus the "thing"
is tarnished. The DIY community is composed of independent publishers,
Artists, musicians, writers, artisans and thinkers." (Diysearch.
(2002). http://www.diysearch.com/)
-
Examples of DIY culture include self made clothing from the basic
materials bought in a fabric store, to self sufficient agriculture
where one grows gardens and raises livestock to eat without purchasing
from a supermarket, radio broadcasters called Free Radio (Pirate
Radio) who build their own studios and broadcast in certain local
areas (this was made famous by the movie starring
Christian Slater, Pump Up the Volume (1990)), and
self publishers called zinesters who create their own magazines
called zines (see below).
-
zines
-
Zines are self published magazines that largely
grew out of the 1970s punk rock scene. (Although
there is a longer history of zines in various forms starting with
The Comet published in 1930 by the Science Correspondence
Club and is believed to be the first fanzine. The roots of zines
can also be attributed to pamphlets in late 17th century England
and during the times of the American Revolution (1760-1791); the
most famous was Thomas Paine's Common Sense, published in 1776.)
The zine movement expanded in the 1980s and 1990s to include
a wide range of topics and issues. There is high level of appropriation
in the creation of zines, some of it critical and some of it in
praise of various mass media.

-
TYPES of zines
· Fanzines (science fiction, music, sports,
TV and film, etc.)
· Political zines (Politics (capital 'P')
= Anarchist, Socialist, Libertarian, Fascist, and "identity"
categories such as Feminist and Queer) (politics (lowercase 'p')
= no identification with the specific categories but explore issues
in general)
· Personal zines or perzines (zines that tell
stories about the zinester, such as a diary or a zine dedicated
to a friend who has died)
· Scene zines (zines that cover and/or review
scenes such as live music)
· Network zines (zines that focus on collecting
information about other zines, could be reviews and/or classifies
for ordering zines)
· Fringe Culture zines (UFOs, conspiracy theories,
serial killers, etc.)
· Religious zines (covering a wide range from
witches, born-again Christians, or joke religions such as the Church
of the SubGenius)
· Vocational zines (zines that tell stories
about the workplace, usually as satire)
· Health zines (alternative medicine or information
about health issues such as AIDS)
· Sex zines (straight, homosexual,
bondage, etc.)
· Travel zines (as in a travel log on a cross-country
Greyhound bus trip or focusing on travel locations)
· Comix (zines that are formatted as comics
with panels of illustrations instead of an emphasis on the written
word)
· Literary zines (original short stories or
poetry)
· Art zines (non-narrative illustration zines)
· THE REST!
(Duncombe, S. (1997). Notes from underground: zines and the
politics of alternative culture. New York, NY: Verso. pp. 9
- 13.)
-
ISSUES/TOPICS
· Identity = Giving voice to the voiceless.
Zinesters are seen, by others and themselves, as a group of individuals
who cannot afford to publish professionally through large publishing
houses. Since it is cheap and easy to produce the zines, many diverse
voices can be heard that normally would not otherwise be heard.
· History = As mentioned above, zines, as
we know them currently, originated with the punk rock movement of
the 1970s. Zines were used to review bands and to get the word out
about the underground movement (to other underground movements).
But in addition, zines have roots in late 17th century England and
during the times of the American Revolution.
· Community = Zinesters usually are seen as
individuals creating unique works of art, but there are aspects
of collective zines and Distros (distribution centers) that create
more tight knit communities of zinesters. Recently, since the late
1990s, there have been zine conferences and symposiums held throughout
the United States.
· Consumption and Participatory Culture = Zines
both critique and idealize consumer culture. Most zinesters have
grown up with the mass media and many of their works focus on elements
of the mass media. Even when the criticism is negative, zines could
not exist without consumer culture because of the need to appropriate
this rich area of material. Indeed, since the mid-1990s, the mass
media has picked up on zines and appropriated zine formats for corporate
magazines and art catalogs.
· DIY = Zines and zinesters, for the most
part, live squarely in a Do It Yourself publishing culture. Zinesters
create their works by appropriation, personal computers, staplers,
sheets of typing paper, Kinkos copy centers, and distribute their
works on racks at locally owned record and book stores.
· Distribution = Everyone who creates a work
of art and publication wants it to be seen, whether it is by friends
and family or the general public. Zinesters utilize many forms of
distribution to get their word out. Examples include locally owned
record stores, in college unions, in commercial magazine racks,
through Distros (zine distribution centers), and/or trade.
· Purity and Danger - Keeping it Real or Selling Out = One
huge problem for zinesters is the aspect of selling out. Since many
zines ride a fine line between mass media criticism and worship
many creators end up wanting to have their work be seen by a large
number of people. In the mid-1990s there was a fair amount of mainstream
coverage about zines and zinesters. During this time many in the
zinester community complained that others were selling out by letting
the mass media exploit them for commercial gain. Hence the underground
became the above ground, and became a fad.
· Mass Media (Aboveground) vs. the (Alternative) Underground
= As mentioned above zines are constantly fighting
to keep their identity pure in the sense as being the underground,
and this underground is seen as the purest way in which to give
as many voices the opportunity to speak to the public.
|