1) d 2) d 3) c 4) b 5) c 6) a 7) a 8) c 9) d 10) b 11) c 12) b 13) a 14) b 15) c
1) The table would look as follows remembering that a) TFC does not vary with output b) TC=TFC+TVC c) AVC=TVC/Q d) AFC=TFC/Q e) ATC=TC/Q f) MC is the change in TVC (or TC) for each increase in quantity Quantity TVC TFC TC AVC AFC ATC MC PRICE 0 0 50 50 80 1 50 50 100 50 50 100 50 80 2 90 50 140 45 25 70 40 80 3 110 50 160 36.7 16.7 53.3 20 80 4 150 50 200 37.5 12.5 50 40 80 5 210 50 260 42 10 52 60 80 6 290 50 340 48.3 8.3 56.6 80 80 7 410 50 460 58.6 7.1 65.7 120 80 Diminishing marginal returns start after Q=3 when MC starts increasing. Profit maximization happens at Q=6 where MC=MR=Price=80. Profit at Q=6 is TR - TC = (Price * Q) - TC = 80*6 - 340 = 480 - 340 = 140 economic profit. 2) Rather than having an "upside down bowl" shape the MP curve would look like a bowl, with increasing MP for higher level of labor after a certain point. Therefore, rather than having a "bowl" shape the MC, AVC and ATC curves would look like upside down bowls, implying that costs go down for higher levels of output. A profit-maximizing firm facing some constant positive price would end up wanting to produce an infinite amount of product, because the more they produce the lower their costs, and thus the more profit they make on each extra unit. The MC graph would intersect the AVC and ATC curves from above at their MAXIMUM values. The AFC graph would look exactly the same. 3) Since there are no fixed costs (TFC), there are no AFC. Thus, the average variable costs (AVC) = average total costs (ATC) and there is just one curve that represents both AVC and ATC.