Idea A: Matrix organizational plan.
Shirien Chappell (date)
In general, work places are organized by functions, divisions, or
matrices
The library has been organized by divisions, with cross-divisional
groups (such as Initiatives) being appointed as needed. As I think
about the merger of AcS, ILL, and LCS, it seems that a matrix
organizational structure might be a good fit.
A matrix organizational structure assigns everybody to a line supervisor
and a permanent responsibility for a functional duty, and then each
person also has responsibility for a team or project duty. Those
projects or teams change as the needs of the organization change. The
projects or teams are not permanent: they spring into existence as they
are needed, and die when their work is done.
A light-weighted matrix organizational structure places the emphasis on
the line supervisor and permanent functional duties, and less emphasis
on the team duties. A heavy-weighted matrix organizational structure
places the emphasis more on the team projects.
The benefit of a matrix organization for Access Services is that it
emphasizes the department's mission by
- incorporating flexibility of assignments into each position,
- placing an emphasis on understanding and then meeting the
needs
of our patrons (all staff regularly work at public service desks, all
staff shelve, page, and scan materials as needed,)
- encourages staff to take responsibility for the success of the
department rather than for only their assigned job.
(While the mission statement hasn't been written, I think it will
include statements about providing speedy access to known items in a
welcoming manner, all with the aim of enriching the student learning
experience, encouraging exploration and research at all levels, and
contributing to advancements in access to scholarly resources…)
The following idea uses a somewhat modified matrix plan: it contains
the line/functional assignment, and instead of a temporary project
assignment, it uses a permanent community pool assignment. (I define a
"permanent community pool" as a work unit which has only one permanent
staff assigned to coordinate the work of other staff who regularly visit
the pool to work there.) The idea also allows for a temporary project
effort to spring up only as long as it's needed.
Each staff has three equally important parts of her/his job: a.
regular line/function work, b. regular community pool work, and c.
as-needed special project work. These three portions of each job are
not necessarily divided into equal parts, time-wise: on average, some
jobs may have more focus on the line/function portion while others may
spend more time in the community pool portion. The as-needed special
project portion depends on the project.
Matrix Organizational Model for Access Services:
- The department consists of:
- Two work units which are line/functional units. Each is
supervised by an OA and has several classified staff permanently
assigned to it. Example names of work units: External Library
Lending, and Support Functions
- Two community pools, each of which is supervised an OA, and
which have only one Classified staff assigned permanently to it, whose
major responsibility is to coordinate the work of classified staff who
work there regularly, and student staff who work there permanently.
(Example names: Service Desk Pool and Shelving/Paging Pool) (The
Classified staff permanently assigned to each pool treats the pool as
her line/functional work unit).
- Temporary Assignments: as needed, staff may be assigned to a
temporary project (such as helping get scanning done, or a one-time data
entry push, or a team to analyze a specific workflow or procedure).
- Functional work units and Community Pools:
- Each OA (and maybe the Dept. Head) is responsible for
the
management of their assigned functional work unit and/or community
pool: they do the interviewing (with the Dept. Head), training,
supervision, scheduling, and evaluations for the Classified staff
permanently assigned to that functional work unit or community pool.
However, the OAs and the dept. head also form a management team and
since staff perform work for more than one OA, they consult with each
other before evaluations are written or other needs (training,
reassignment to a different functional work unit or community pool,
etc.) are addressed.
- Each Classified staff in the functional work unit is responsible
for one job, and his job title reflects that specialty. Examples of
Clerk titles in functional work units: Billing Clerk, Paging Clerk,
Summit Clerk, ILL Requests Clerk, Photocopier Maintenance Clerk, Scanner
Clerk, E-Res Clerk, Shelving Clerk. Examples of Clerk titles in
community pool (which treat this assignment as their functional work
unit, and are probably LSA IIIs: Shelving/Paging Clerk, Service Desk
Clerk.
- Each day each Classified staff spends her time split between
doing the duties of her job title and working in a Community Pool. (The
split is not necessarily 50/50)
- Also, as needed, clerks are given temporary assignments in other
functional work units. The Temporary Assignment works this way: as
the workflow changes through the term, a clerk can inform her OA that
she needs X hours of assistance for a few days. The OA talks with the
OA Team and they direct other clerks to report to the clerk needing
help. Example: The Scanning Clerk reports that there is more than
usual scanning to be done . The OA sends message to other OAs, who
direct their clerks to report to Scanning Clerk for x hours/day until
the work is caught up.
- The Shelving/Paging Community Pool has a greater percentage of
students assigned to it and fewer permanent Classified staff working in
it; the Service Desk Community Pool has all Classified staff working
regularly in it and some student assistants (night-time closure, etc.)
- Cross training: Each Classified staff is also responsible for
being cross-trained into at least one other clerk's duties (either in
her own functional work unit or in another one).
- Student workers:
- The Support Functions work unit is responsible for
general
orientation of all student workers (hazcomm, how to fill out timesheets,
sexual harassment, expectations for their performance, public service
attitudes, and basic departmental core competencies)
- Students are permanently assigned to functional work units.
Those working in the Shelving/Paging or Service Desk Pools treat those
pools as their functional work unit. That is, not every student in the
department works at the desks, but every student does spend some time in
the stacks.
- Other functional work units can ask the OA team for temporary
student assistance as needed.
- Functional work units or Community Pools which have students
permanently assigned do their own training on specific skills.
- I don't know who does timesheets and evals: probably the
permanent functional work unit.
Functional Work Units:
- External Library Borrowing/Lending:
- All incoming materials (not brand new books, etc.) are brought
from
the mail room (from the courier, campus branch run, mail, etc.) to the
External Unit. Staff check them in and put them on trucks to be taken
to final destination (stacks, branches, hold shelves, etc.)
- Items returned to the Checkout Desk by patrons are brought to the
External unit for check in item.
- Processes UO items going out to all extermal libraries: ILL, Summit.
Does the Janus work, and packages them (puts in courier bags or affixes
labels, etc. for the Mail Room staff to package)
- Processes UO items coming in from external libraries: (checkin,
any
record manipulation, and them puts them on trucks to be shelved)
- Processes incoming non-UO returnables: checks in, makes bib/item
records, etc. and places on trucks for hold shelves.
- Processes incoming ILL requests for non-returnables: prints
notices,
does record work, etc., and gives slips to Stacks Pool for paging.
- Processes nonUO items being returned to external libraries: checks
in, packages, etc.
- Processes UO returnable items going to to UO libraries or
departments
(docdel) - receives items paged from UO stacks by Stacks Pool, checks
them out, and puts them in intra-library bags, etc.
- Prints paging slips for UO electronic docdel (articles/chapters of
UO
materials to be scanned and sent to UO patrons)
- Support Functions:
- billing, invoicing, (patrons and other libraries)
- reserve processing (traditional and e-res)
- processes search packets: does all Janus work pre and post. Just
doesn't search stacks.
- Janus table/loads maintenance
- Copiers: deal with money, in-depth maintenance, vendors,
replacements, etc. routine copier maintenance
- equipment in 101
- relables
Community Pools:
- Service Desks Pool:
- Checkout/Information
- checkout, holds, renewals
- creation of patrons records, OR Cards
- routine ILL questions
- $ on copy cards
- sell products (discs, overheads, etc.)
- evening building closure/emergencies
- hold shelf maintenance
- scan and send items to patrons (bothUO and non-UO)
- Reserves/Videos
- checkouts/shelving reserves
- does bookings
- checkout video collection and viewing stations
- scanning amd send items to patrons (both UO and non-UO)
- Stacks: (Shelving/Paging) Pool:
- Shelving
- Shifting
- Searches stacks (formal searches) and returns packets to Support
Function Unit.
- Paging for Summit, ILL, distance ed, DocDel
- Student basic training, so that each unit doesn't have to do the
same training: orientation to the building, to our services, to our
public service attitude, to the catalog and its contents and to the
basic structure of records…
- Student paperwork? Timesheets?
Conclusion:
While we have been organized primarily by division (Circ/Res & Videos,
and Current Periodicals &Stacks), we do have experience helping out
other work units either permanently or on an as-needed basis. We have a
.5 FTE position in CPS dedicated to performing ILL duties. Other AcS
staff members work in ILL and MDLS on a permanent and regular basis.
LCS staff scan for ILL. In addition, staff are asked to help shelve as
needed, help input data for special projects, or work in other
departments during library-wide projects.
This new matrix plan isn't as radical as it might seem: perhaps the
most important benefit it gives is the institutionalization of these
ideas:
- increased flexibility of work assignments: rather than owning a
specific task and belonging to a specific work unit, staff have primary
responsibility for a task and equally important, responsibility for
work in various community pools or for helping other staff with their
primary responsibilities as needed.
- increased sense of responsibility for the success of the department
and library: sharing work throughout the department can increase staff
sense of ownership of the success of the whole.
These new attitudes will enhance our ability to add new services and
remove old ones. We need to see ourselves as continually providing the
services that the patrons want, not continually providing the services
we're used to providing.