|
Ulisse Aldrovandi's
Monstrous Rooster
Image right: Ulisse
Aldrovandi, from the frontispiece his Ornithologiae, vol. 2 (1600).
In the second of his three-volume Ornithologiae (1599-1603),
the Italian naturalist Ulisse Aldrovandi (1522-1605) reported that in
his youth, he had seen this “monstrous” rooster, depicted
at the left, with a “quadruped’s tail and a chicken’s
crest…at the palace of the Most Serene Grand Duke of Tuscany, Francesco
Medici.”
Why not take Aldrovandi at his
word? He was certainly a credible source of information. As a young man,
he had studied law, philosophy, logic and mathematics at the universities
of Bologna and Padua. He completed a degree in medicine and philosophy
in 1553, and began teaching logic the following year. His interests soon
shifted to natural history, however, and in 1561 Aldrovandi became the
first professor of natural philosophy at the University of Bologna. As
a naturalist, Aldrovandi proved to be a terrifically prolific scholar:
in addition to his three-volume book on birds, Aldrovandi wrote treatises
on insects (De animalibus insectis, 1602) fish (De piscibus),
on the remains of bloodless animals (De reliquis animalibus exanguibus),
as well as a natural history of serpents and dragons (Historia serpentum
et draconum, 1640)—one of his last works—not to mention
hundreds of treatises that were not published during his lifetime. At
his instance, the senate of Bologna established in 1568 a botanical garden,
of which he was appointed the first director. About the same time he became
inspector of drugs, and in that capacity published in 1574 a work entitled
Antidotarii Bononiensis Epitome, which formed the model for many subsequent
pharmacopoeias. Aldrovandi also established a botanical garden in Bologna.
In the course of his long career as a naturalist, Aldrovandi assembled
one of the largest zoological collections anywhere in Europe, with over
18,000 specimens, according to a description written in 1595. Linnaeus
recalled him fondly as the “father of natural history.”
So, Aldrovandi was nothing if
not a keen observer of the natural world and an authoritative source of
information about its phenomena. If Aldrovandi reported the existence
of rooster with a “quadruped’s tail,” who would doubt
him?
In Aldrovandi, two worlds intersect—one
in which ancient texts still exerted a powerful authority on naturalists,
but also on in which precise observation of natural phenomena is fast
becoming the basis for the accumulation of new, scientific knowledge about
the world. Thus Aldrovandi could believe that a monstrous rooster really
had existed; Aldrovandi's own observations of natural deformities seemed
only to confirm the possibility that such monsters could occur in nature.
|