The Anthropocentric
Model of the Universe Image source: The Galileo Project (Rice University) In the first book of the Almagest, Ptolemy presented the cosmological assumptions, which served as the foundation of his astronomy. Ptolemy stated (Book I, chap. 2) that 'the first order of business is to grasp the relationship of the earth taken as a whole to the heavens taken as a whole'. He outlined the 'general preliminary discussion', covering these topics: 1. The heaven is spherical in shape and moves spherically;
This man-centered or “anthropocentric” model of the universe was based on a series of assumptions. First, it assumed that physical laws were not universal: the region below the moon (a.k.a., the “sublunary” region of the cosmos) was imperfect and subject to change and decay. The heavens, like God, were perfect--eternal, unchanging. Second, the model assumed that every element in the physical world had a natural “place” in the cosmos and was attracted physically to it. Earth was the heaviest element and belonged at the center; was lighter therefore tended to rise to the surface of Earth; fire and air were lighter still, and exhibited a “natural,” upward motion. Thus all motion in the universe was goal-oriented: “natural motion” was the movement of the elements toward their proper place in the hierarchy of celestial spheres. All other motion breached those laws and was therefore “violent”. |
Tycho Brahe’s Attempt at Synthesis Tycho Brahe (1546-1601), a Danish astronomer, attempted to reconcile modern observations of the planetary motions with the Aristotelian/Ptolemaic universe. Convinced that advances in astronomy depended on accurate observation, Brahe accepted an offer from the Danish King Frederick II to establish an observatory on an island near Copenhagen, which he called Uraniburg. It was far and away the most advanced technologically and accurate observatory of the time, and the calculations Brahe made with it seriously undermined key assumptions that underlay the Aristotelian/Ptolemaic model of the universe. His obervations of a new comet in 1577, for example, established that these celestial bodies moved through the spheres. Comets could not, therefore, be carried through the heavens on these solid but translucent, concentric orbs whose ascending hierarchy of celestial perfection was thought to comprise the universe. The heavens, Brahe proved, were changeable. Aristotle's division between the heavenly and sublunary regions was no longer tenable.But Brahe was unable to abandon the anthropocentric
model in favor of Copernicus' heliocentrism, which he regarded as absurd.
Part of the problem was that Copernicus' calculations were unreliable
and based on out-of-date tables of latitude and longitude. If the Earth
were not the center of the universe, he reasoned, then physics (as it
was then known) was utterly undermined. On the other hand, the heliocentric model gave explanations for observable phenomena, such as the retrograde planetary motion. So Brahe strove to reconcile Copernicus' findings with the Ptolemaic model and his own, more accurate observations. In place of heliocentrism, Brahe developed a system that kept the Earth in the center of the universe, so that he could retain Aristotelian physics (the only physics available). The Moon and Sun revolved about the Earth, and the shell of the fixed stars was centered on the Earth. But Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn revolved about the Sun. He put the (circular) path of the comet of 1577 between Venus and Mars. This Tychonic world system became popular early in the seventeenth century among those who felt forced to reject the Ptolemaic arrangement of the planets (in which the Earth was the center of all motions) but who, for various reasons, could not accept the Copernican alternative. Image above: Tycho Brahe (1546-1601); image source: The Galileo Project (Rice University). Image right: a diagram of the Tychonic model of the universe; image source: The Galileo Project (Rice University). |