Trial by Water
Trial by water was the oldest form of ordeal in medieval Europe. There were two forms, hot and cold. In a trial by hot water (judicium aquae ferventis), also known as the “cauldron ordeal,”a large kettle of water would be heated to the boiling point and a ring or jewel placed at the bottom. The accused person reached in to grab the object; if he seized it and removed his arm without injury, he accused was deemed innocent. In a trial by cold water, the accused would be tied, thrown into a river, and found innocent if she sank, guilty if she floated. |
|
The Bleeding Ordeal
This form of ordeal was meant to ascertain the guilt or innocence of a person accused of murder. The suspect would be taken to the exposed body of his alleged victim. The accused placed his hand on the mortal wound, then swore an oath to his own innocence. If the corpse bled, the accused was guilty; if it did not bleed, he was innocent. The bleeding ordeal was predicated on the assumption that the soul of the deceased continued to reside inside the body and wished to revenge the loss of its body against the killer. Source: Eidgenössische Chronik des Luzerners Diebold Schilling (1513). Image source: Wikimedia Commons. |
Strappado, Estrapade
The method of strappado involved tying the suspect's hand behind her/his back, then suspending the victim in the air by means of a rope tied to the wrists. This procedure often disolocated both shoulders. To intensify the pain this inflicted, the patient might be bounced by the rope; or weights might be tied to the victim's ankles. One advantage of this method was that it left no external mark on the body of the accused. Depicted here is the interrogation under torture given to the Swiss mercenary, Hans Spiess, who had been accused of murdering his wife, Margret. In this scene, A judge reads the interrogatoria to Spiess and records his answers. At the left, an executioner stands at the ready to hoist him up a notch. At Spiess's feet are weights to aggravate the pain of stappado. As we saw last week, Spiess maintained his innocence throughout the trial and was found guilty only after he failed a bleeding corpse ordeal. This image is from the Lucern Chronicle of Diebold Schilling (<1460-1515?). Another torture device—the “rack”—was a more controlled variation of the same technique. A page from the Constitutio criminalis Theresiana—shows the culprit tied by his wrists to a ladder-like structure, in the same manner as strappado, with the legs attached by rope to a roller with a rachet mechanism that enabled the executioner to increase or decrease more precisely the level of pain and bodily dislocation. |
|
Screws
Screws were another common torture implement, all of which were designed inflict pain by applying pressure to the bony extremities—fingers, thumbs, shins, and feet. Most of the devices in this group consisted of two plates, studded with knobs or spikes which were applied to the finger or leg and then progressively squeezed by means of screws to inflict the desired measure of pain. Pictured here is a shin- or leg-screw from the Constitutio criminalis Theresiana, published in 1769, a code of criminal procedure for the lands subject to the Habsburg monarchy—a sprawling territory comprising the modern territories of Austria, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, Croatia, and parts of Romania. Its purpose was to standardize judicial torture throughout the Habsburg lands. Source: Constitutio criminalis Theresiana oder der Römisch-Kayserl. zu Hungarn und Böheim etc. etc. Königl. Apost. Majestät Mariä Theresiä Erzherzogin zu Oesterreich etc. etc. peinliche Gerichtsordnung (Vienna: Edlen von Trattnern, 1569). Image source: habsburger.net. |
|
Water Torture
The use of water torture was less widespread than either strappado or the screws, and appears to have been employed primarily in France, Spain, and the Low Countries. This image of the so-called “French Torture” (tortura gallica) or “Water Torture” (question de l'eau) comes from the Praxis criminis persequendi (1541), a manual for the criminal procedure, including the application of judicial torture, by Jean Milles de Souvigny who dedicated the treatise to King François I. In 1576, the Flemish Anabaptist, Raphael van de Velde, included included in a prison-letter to his son the following account of his own experience with water torture:
Van de Velde was subsequently found guilty of heresy and was burned at the stake in Ghent on July 14, 1576. Source: Jean Milles de Souvigny, Praxis criminis persequendi, elegantibus aliquot figuris illustrata (Paris: Simon Colin, 1541). Image source: The European Library. |