Recall the inverse square law:
![]() |
The brightness of the Sun falls off as 1/D2 and so if we know the distance to the Sun we can infer its true brightness from its measured brightness. The most direct way to determine stellar distances is annual trigonometric parallax. Seems straightforward enough, are there other problems? |
Yes, we need to know the total flux from the Sun or star (which is referred to as the bolometric flux):
![]() |
![]() |
The atmosphere of the Earth only allows the visible and radio (plus some bands in other wavelength regions to hit the Earth's surface) and so, in order to measure the bolometric luminosity of the Sun one must send probes above the Earth's atmosphere to measure the Solar spectrum. Once this is done we can then use our knowledge of the Astronomical Unit to infer that the Solar luminosity is 3.84x1026 Watts.
This is the way in which other star's luminosities must also be determined. The bolometric flux is always difficult to measure, but the major difficulty is finding accurate distances to stars. What is the current source of most direct determinations of distances (and hence, luminosities)?
Hipparcos was launched by the European Space Agency (ESA) in 1989, operating until 1993. It was the first space experiment devoted to precision astrometry. This permitted the accurate determination of proper motions and parallaxes of stars, allowing a determination of their distance and tangential velocity. When combined with radial velocity measurements from spectroscopy, this pinpointed all six quantities needed to determine the motion of stars. The resulting Hipparcos Catalogue, a high-precision catalogue of more than 118,200 stars, was published in 1997. The lower-precision Tycho Catalogue of more than a million stars was published at the same time, while the enhanced Tycho-2 Catalogue of 2.5 million stars was published in 2000. Hipparcos' follow-up mission, Gaia, was launched in 2013.