Cosmology is an interesting science in many respects. A particularly fascinating thing is that Cosmology is a science for which, in the past, progress was driven by belief as well as by empirical data. Today, the situation is completely different. Modern cosmological thinking is driven primarily by empirical data, the quality and quantity of which improves day-by-day. In Astronomy 123: Cosmology, we review the current state of our understanding of the Universe and our place in the Universe through consideration of theoretical models and the observational facts that underlie and drive the modeling.
Although, on occasion, theoretical progress was driven by philosophical concepts, we do not imply that the theories which were invented were unfalsifiable (not testable) by data and therefore unscientific. We mean that sometimes workers chose to explore and develop ideas about the Universe driven by philosophy but that these notions had to lead to predictions amenable to experiment and thus testable (falsifiable) within some reasonable time frame.
We do not know a ton of things about the Universe (such as we do about the Solar System, for example), but there are several important things which we do know. We will expand greatly on each bit of information in the next few weeks.
Today, we interpret these observations (and some further ones) within the context of what is known as the Big Bang Theory. We will say much more on the Big Bang later. However, note that the theory asserts only that the Universe in past was much smaller and denser and has been expanding since that time. These notions are amply supported by the current observations. Most of the current work improves on the details of the model, not its general validity. We will next investigate some ideas (principles) which have guide (or guided) how we view the Universe.
Scales of the Universe
![]()
Time line of the Universe |