Brief remarks about philosophy and religion
in the Ming Dynasty
Philosophy
Since the Song Dynasty, Neo-Confucianism, the philosophy
developed by Zhu Xi (1130-1200) which integrated the Confucian ideology, a
philosophy of rational inquiry and aspects of metaphysics as perceived relevant
in other religious and philosophical teachings had become the dominant ideology
in among Chinese literati.
Guided by an immaterial principle inherent in all beings
and giving them essence, man should investigate the principle inherent in
things. At the same time one should pursue the path of cultivation of principles
of the mind [self-cultivation].
In the Ming Dynasty, Wang Yangming
(1472-1529;= Wang Shouren)
propagated the idea, that this principle was not only giving form and essence
to all beings (and things) and thus form the essence of the universe, but
also existed in the human mind. He objected to the separation of the principle
in things and in the mind. [A famous example why in his opinion principle
and mind could not be separated was the concept of filial piety. He said that
if principle were outside the mind, then the principle of filial piety would
be irrelevant as soon as a parent dies.]
This universal principle, which was seen as innate in all
human beings, could be cultivated through practicing humaneness and giving
one’s behavior a strong moral basis, while Zhi Xi
saw the exploration of the principle as an intellectual endeavor. The universal
moral laws are the Principle of Nature’, which is innate knowledge and intelligence.
It reveals itself in the behavior of every human being, no matter whether
a person was literate or had received a sophisticated education. To know oneself,
one’s strengths and weaknesses, and to bring one’s creative spirit and direct,
spontaneous, and intuitive insights into a balance of (theoretical) knowledge
and (practical) action was seen as the ultimate moral goal of every human
being.
“Knowledge is the beginning of action, and
action is the completion of knowledge.”
Religion
The emperors of the Ming had different religious inclinations.
While Zhu Yuanzhang supported Chinese Buddhism (and
aimed to eliminate Tibetan Lamaism, which had been propagated by the Mongol
rulers), and was also increasingly interested in the writings of Daoism (he
even wrote a commentary on the Daodejing), the Yongle emperor (Zhu Di) tried to re-establish the connection
with Tibetan Buddhism by inviting the karmapa Halima
to Nanjing and asking him to perform a sacrifice for the emperors’ deceased
parents. His attempts to make political use of the connection with the lama
failed due to Halima’s resistance to allow Chinese troops to occupy Tibet,
although the emperor had made him the official leader of all Chinese Buddhists
and had hoped that this ‘imperial grace’ would earn him Halima’s approval
to invade Tibet.
Christiantiy had found its way to
[We will hear more about him in one of the presentations.]
Since the Mongol Yuan dynasty Muslim officials had served multiple times in
Chinese government functions. In the Ming Islam was largely tolerated, but
not always were Chinese Muslims appreciated as neighbors. On several occasions
violent actions against Muslim communities led to severe persecutions.
Medical knowledge transmitted by Muslim physicians was appreciated by the
Chinese and gained influence in the diet. In addition, Islamic art gained
recognition. Cobalt became an indispensable decoration element of Chinese
porcelain.
One of the most prominent Buddhist monks in the Ming
was abbot Yunqi Zhuhong
(1535-1615), who advocated the attempt to integrate the most important
non-controversial aspects of Confucianism, Buddhism, and Daoism in the ‘Three
Teachings in One’.
Trying to avoid confrontations with Confucianism
and Daoism he stressed [religious] self-cultivation. Specializations in the
doctrine of different sects were of no importance to him. Instead, he followed
a pragmatic combination of Chan [=Zen] and Pure Land Buddhism in which he integrated elements of Confucian and Daoist origin.
He also created a significant Buddhist
lay movement which allowed the lay communities to live according to
Buddhist guidance without having to leave their families and following a celibate
life. In his guidelines he established ‘accounts’ of merit points to inspire
the communities to live a life in accordance with Buddhist principles and
acquire good karma. His catalogue of merit and demerit
points had several chapters: Good deeds inspired by loyalty and filiality,
altruism and compassion, and religious practices that were rewarded with merit
points; Bad deeds (of disloyalty and unfilial behavior,
non-altruism and not showing compassion, and deeds that could harm the Buddhist
teachings or community. Examples: For each domestic animal saved, that has
no power to return human kindness, count ten merits. To cause one person’s
death by spells, prayers, and curses counts as one hundred demerits.
(see Chun-fang Yu, The Renewal of Buddhism in china. Chu-hung and the Late Ming Synthesis. New York: Columbia University Press 1981.)