It is the year 2050 and countries around the world are struggling to meet their carbon neutrality goals. While renewable energy makes up the majority of electricity generation, this still falls short of the production that is needed to prevent catastrophic climate change, which is predicted to wreak havoc on the earth in the next 25 years if countries cannot cut down on their carbon emissions and increase renewable energy production. With many countries increasingly adopting Bitcoin as legal tender to pair with legacy fiat currencies in their respective financial systems, including the United States and China, significant investments have been made into Bitcoin mining facilities to give countries a steady of inflow of Bitcoin into their national reserves.
The last couple of decades have gone by without any significant conflict developing amongst members of the Bitcoin community, which has played a tremendous role in a smoother adoption on a global scale. Members of the community realized from past conflicts, such as the blocksize war, that being at odds and at each other’s throats was simply a waste of time. Everyone came to a consensus that they were better off staying united and acting pragmatically to address any issues rather than creating spiteful division between parties.
This large increase in the adoption of Bitcoin has significantly increased the hash power of the entire Bitcoin network to over 2 billion exahashes per second with the block mining difficulty increasing accordingly. Due to the heightened difficulty of mining a block, Bitcoin mining now consumes over 10% of global energy consumption, up from 0.55% in 2021. A majority of mining operations have successfully converted to running entirely off renewable energy sources, a transition that was overseen by the newly established Global Climate Committee (GCC), which provides regulatory oversight of energy production and usage globally with a particular focus on the Bitcoin mining industry.
However, this isn’t cutting it for the GCC, which wants to see 100% of Bitcoin mining fueled by renewable energy due to the extreme energy intensity required to run and cool the newest and most advanced models of ASICs. In order to make ground on global climate change projects and goals, the GCC mandated that all non-renewable mining operations, which made up 25% of total hashpower at the time (the GCC referred to these miners as “the crude bunch”), must convert to renewable energy sources within 6 months, otherwise they would be forced to shut down. After 6 months, anyone caught mining Bitcoin with non-renewable energy sources faced a $1 billion fine and 10 years imprisonment, in addition to confiscation of all mining equipment and repossession of buildings used to house the mining equipment.
Up until this point, Bitcoiners had largely been indifferent to having GCC oversight of the mining industry as the oversight was purely limited to energy production and consumption, meaning there was no impact on the software or protocols being run on the ASICs, subjects that had been the root of much contention in prior Bitcoin debacles. Additionally, having the GCC involved gave a desperately needed air of legitimacy to Bitcoin mining (and therefore an ego boost to Bitcoiners), which previously had been looked down upon by many politicians and public figures in the industry’s early days. However, this mandate by the GCC had miners in uproar as 1) they had been using fossil fuels and other non-renewables sources for decades, so they didn’t see why it was all of a sudden a problem now, and 2) the investment required for a renewables project was now on orders of millions of dollars, cash that most mining operations simply did not have on hand (unless they wanted to sell millions of dollars’ worth of ASICs, which was not going to happen). Additionally, the GCC was unwilling to subsidize any new projects as its budget happened to be extremely tight that year. This left the crude bunch stranded and searching for options to modify their operations at breakneck pace over the next six months. However, with miniscule cash budgets and no simple or cheap forms of renewable energy to fall back on, their survival was not looking likely.
One night, a week after the GCC had made its dreaded announcement, two popular Bitcoin influencers by the names of SanSAT Claus and Uncle Bitty found themselves recounting childhood memories of spending time with their hamsters via a Twitter exchange. Both remembered watching their hamsters run on a hamster wheel for hours on end and wondering what went through a hamster’s mind as it ran in place with a looming wheel spinning at 50 rpm around it. This was only meant to be a friendly Twitter exchange that was part of a longer thread about the impending extinction of hamsters caused by global warming, but it sparked an unlikely conversation between the two that lead to the idea of using hamsters to mine Bitcoin. The conversation went a little something like this:
SanSAT: Bro I been thinking lately and I rlly miss my hamster Pedro. I remember buying him for like 250k sats and thinking to myself that it was a stupid waste of BTCs, but looking back on it, he was somethin special ya know. I’m over it now, but man hamsters are beautiful creatures, aren’t they?
Bitty: Yeah, tots man, I had a hamster growin up too, his name was Saucy, he’d go off like a maniac on that hamster wheel, runnin on it non-stop that we had to replace it 5 times lol. Wonder what went through his mind as he got on the wheel and just started runnin. They got some legit stamina.
SanSAT: Hold up, wait a minute…
Bitty: What’s up bro?
SanSAT: Ya know how Bitcoin miners need to come up with a renewable mining source within the next 6 months, but the GCC kinda screwed them because that’s basically impossible for them to do?
Bitty: yeahhhhh, so what…?
SanSAT: Ur gonna think I’m crazy, but just hear me out…what if we made a kickass hamster-powered miner that takes the rotational kinetic energy from a spinning hamster wheel and uses that energy to mine Bitcoins?
Bitty: That’s the stupidest f*ckin idea I’ve ever heard, is this a joke? are you on crack rn??
SanSAT: Uh uh no cap bruh, shut up, it’s not a joke, I’m being dead serious – they have a problem, I (might) have a solution. Why don’t we give it a shot? Can’t hurt right? You got an engineering background, right? You gotta be able to make something happen!
Bitty: I’m very very skeptical, but honestly I’m bored af, crypto trading is dead and dry af atm, so yeah why not, let’s go balls to the wall on this thing.
And with that, the two immediately got started on this crazy, probably never gonna work hamster-powered Bitcoin mining concept. At the time, it sounded like possibly the most outlandish idea in all of crypto, even more crazy and stupid than NFTs and ponzi-esque yield farming schemes, but little did they know that they were on to something.
SanSAT and Bitty made a perfect tandem to bring this project to life. The former grew up in Upstate New York where both his parents worked at nearby consulting firms. He developed an interest in cryptocurrency and blockchain after visiting New York City in his early-teens and overhearing investment bankers and Wall Street traders mumbling about “the next big crypto deal” as he wandered past the New York Stock Exchange with his parents. SanSAT would attend college close to home at NYU, a college that had become renowned for its research and educational offerings on blockchain and cryptocurrency. With his double major in mathematics and economics, focusing on cryptography and digital asset markets, SanSAT eventually landed a full-time gig with Goldman Sachs’ cryptocurrency trading division, based out of New York.
After four years, he would leave the firm and pursue an MBA from Stanford University, graduating in 2035. Post MBA, he remained in Silicon Valley to work at Andreessen Horowitz’s now $30 billion crypto venture fund that backed what are now some of the most successful and well-known crypto companies. After leaving venture capital 10 years later, SanSAT started his own crypto trading hedge fund with the wealth he had accumulated from his days in VC and assembled a team of some of the brightest financial and mathematical minds in the crypto space to help him develop extremely complex algorithms involving thousands of variables to trade Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. With his experience working in the financial markets and studying the economics of Bitcoin intensely with his trading firm, all SanSAT needed to pull off this crazy vision of his was a technical wiz to engineer an integrated hardware and software solution.
Enter Uncle Bitty. Bitty was a first-generation college student whose parents immigrated to the United States from the Philippines in 2020 when Bitty was just 5 years old. In the years Bitty spent in the Philippines, the country was one of the countries at the forefront of Bitcoin adoption. So soon as Bitty learned to read and understand speech, he immediately became intrigued by his parents’ discussions about Bitcoin and why the U.S. had been so slow in adopting the currency in the early 21st century. Bitty also became fascinated with the technical details behind cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology when he first started coding in middle school. By the time he started college, Bitty had already developed his own decentralized liquidity platform on Ethereum that amassed over half a million daily active users.
Bitty graduated from MIT in 2037 with a dual degree in Computer Science and Mechanical Engineering. His first job out of college was working on various robotics projects at Google. Bitty would then make his way around Silicon Valley at various startups, focused on building artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms for blockchain startups. This technical savvy and background turned out to be the perfect complement to SanSAT’s business and financial acumen. The two would meet at a crypto conference in Los Angeles in 8 years prior to the events of this story, sparking a friendship that blossomed out of a shared passion for Bitcoin and would eventually lead to something special … something the world had never seen.
While SanSAT and Bitty spent months trying to develop this new solution, the crude bunch miners were running on fumes of backup generators and reserve energy supplies that the GCC allowed miners to use during this transition. Mining experts estimated that there was a little over 4.5 months’ worth of energy remaining that this group of miners would have to ration among a reduced number of ASIC miners. The Bitcoin community grew restless and anxious as days and weeks passed by with no solution in sight. Those in favor of abandoning ship and transitioning to Ethereum as the world’s new digital currency took to Twitter, now owned by crypto billionaire Stump Bunkman Fraud (completely unrelated to Sam Bankman-Fried), to spread FUD about how weak Bitcoiners were by submitting to the GCC’s demands and that clearly no one cared about Bitcoin or had the balls to save Bitcoin if no one had come up with a solution yet. They saw this as an opportunity to weaken confidence in Bitcoin and bring into question the character of those behind the network in an attempt to crash the Bitcoin market and network for good. However, Bitcoiners held strong, holding on to a firm belief that someone had to be close to a solution with just one month left before the anticipated depletion of resources.
Just over 4 months after SanSAT and Bitty’s exchange and the crude bunch now down to running very few ASICs to mine, SanSAT and Bitty finally swooped in to save the day on September 18th, 2050, announcing via Twitter that they had finally built a mechanism that would enable Bitcoin to be mined using hamster wheels. This innovation involved attaching a miniature mining rig to a modified hamster wheel that directly converts the rotational kinetic energy generated by the hamster wheel into electricity that powers the miner. These contraptions sold for about $1500 retail to begin with, however, Bitty and SanSAT allowed miners from the crude bunch to exchange their ASICs (which now had no energy source) 1-for-1 for a hamster miner. To stay in business and make some dough, the two would turn around and flip the ASICs to other mining operations that had renewable sources capable of powering ASIC miners.
While hamsters generate significantly less electricity than what would normally be required to power an ASIC, SanSAT and Bitty developed a proprietary AI-enabled chip for its hamster miners, which scales up the number of hashes the miner can run to be on par with the ASIC miners that controlled the other 75% of the network’s hashpower. Otherwise, hamster-powered miners would have no shot at mining competitively and there would be no point to this invention. Traditional ASIC miners clearly took issue with this, thinking it was unfair to artificially boost the hashpower that a little hamster would generate, but in all fairness, the margins on hamster and ASIC mining turned out to be very similar.
Additionally, SanSAT and Bitty integrated another artificial intelligence algorithm they called “Proof-of-Hamster” (PoH) into the new mining rigs to ensure that hamsters were actually being used to power these machines. The PoH algorithm leverages thermal imaging and neural networks to verify that a hamster is indeed the motor behind the hashpower generation. This was by far the most technically challenging element for SanSAT and Bitty to implement into their mining solution, however, after rigorous testing prior to releasing the integrated solution, they engineered and refined the algorithm to achieve a virtually 100% accuracy rate of verifying the presence of a hamster. The infinitesimally small chance that the algorithm faltered is when it incorrectly identified freshly toasted muffins as hamsters, likely due to the presence of heat and the similar color, shape, and perceived texture of muffins. However, SanSAT and Bitty felt there was no need to publicly disclose this information, thinking that there was no way anyone would think to try to use muffins to break the algorithm, and would therefore not cause any issues in the future.
While this practice of essentially enslaving hamsters to mine Bitcoin was frowned upon by some, the GCC allowed mining facilities run by those in the crude bunch to adopt this practice as it indirectly aided in the artificial recovery of the hamster population. Hamsters had only recently become an endangered species due to declining populations from the impacts of global warming and wildlife conservationists had only been focusing efforts on maintaining existing populations before bringing them into captivity to breed. However, despite the positive impact on the hamster population, various humanitarian organizations took issue with this and personally attacked SanSAT and Bitty on Twitter for going through with something so inhumane.
The Primal Conservation Project (@thePCP) tweeted:
December 24th, 2050, 10:18am
@SanSAT @UncleB You two are absolutely terrible human beings! And all the hamster miners out there too! Enslaving hamsters?! You should be ashamed of yourselves. #banit #hamsters #whereisthelove
An hour later, SanSAT Claus replied:
@thePCP First off, what a stupid username – PCP?? (Are you that oblivious?). Second, it’s god damn Christmas Eve, can’t you save your negativity and unbased criticism for another day, maybe April 20th? (that’s 420 if you still don’t get the PCP drug reference). #idiots
Responding to this thread, Uncle Bitty hoped to reason with the PCP:
@SanSAT @thePCP Y’all can’t just blindly criticize us without knowing the straight facts. You encourage keeping hamsters as pets for entertainment, locking them up in their little cages while slobbering kids just sit there and watch, which btw looks terrifying for a cute little hamster. How is that any better than keeping them in a cage to run on a hamster wheel, which again btw THEY DO ANYWAYS for hours and hours every single day. It’s how they exercise since they can’t go outside their cage duh… #getyourfactsstraight
(In the spirit of free speech, Bunkman-Fraud completely removed Twitter’s 280-character limit per tweet, which is why there are some long tweets involved in this story)
No response from the PCP…They got severely ratio’d by both SanSAT and Bitty.
Speaking of the treatment of hamsters, the GCC is also willing to subsidize the costs of feeding and caring for the hamsters (a process that had been automated and industrialized at this point, making it much cheaper than it was previously) because that’s the least they could do after initially screwing over the crude bunch with their original mandate. Additionally, the GCC is requiring that all hamster-powered mining facilities be registered with both it and the facilities’ local governments to ensure “fair” treatment of hamsters and detect uses of ASIC miners through monthly inspections and constant reporting of electricity consumption; any heightened consumption above typical levels would indicate the use of a non-approved higher-powered miner.
Within a couple months after the GCC’s deadline had passed, enough hamsters had been bred and hamster wheel mining rigs manufactured to transition all crude bunch mining facilities across the globe to this new method of Bitcoin mining. However, the production and breeding did not stop there. SanSAT, as the savvy businessman he was, recognized the serious meme potential of hamster mining and demanded that more miners be produced and hamsters be bred in order to have a supply surplus for when this thing exploded and everyone wanted to get their hands on a hamster miner.
The species of hamsters that have been bred specifically for hamster mining are in high demand and mining operations are willing to pay a pretty penny for them (up to $500 for a single hamster) due to their enhanced physical characteristics that been optimized through hundreds of trials and breeding schemes to breed the perfect Bitcoin mining hamster. As a result, consensus under this new regime still trended towards centralization over time because those that are the highest bidders can purchase larger quantities of the best hamsters from breeders and hamster wheel rigs from manufacturers to increase their proportion of hash power on the network.
While it is feasible for individual and non-professional miners to purchase a hamster as a pet and set up a PoH miner at home, they are still at a disadvantage like retail ASIC miners were previously, only this time they are at a disadvantage on price (they aren’t buying PoH miners in bulk at a discount) and on hamster quality (they don’t have the connections to breeders and distributors of the best hamsters). Understanding the inability of small miners to earn sustainable profits from hamster mining, SanSAT and Bitty work to provide an opportunity that allows the average individual to speculate on and indirectly profit from the growing hamster mining industry. With his connections to Wall Street, SanSAT successfully lobbies all the major derivatives exchanges in the U.S. to list and create a market for hamster futures that are based on the open market price for hamsters bred specifically for Bitcoin mining.
SanSAT and Bitty warn the Bitcoin community that this continued centralization will fuel the greed that many feared would be the downfall of the Bitcoin network, however there are now three mining operations that control nearly 60% of the hamster-powered hashrate, which now makes up a larger 40% of Bitcoin’s total hashrate. The two once again took to Twitter to voice their concerns to their combined 4 million followers and encourage hamster miners to change the narrative about mining centralization.
@UncleB tweeted:
Our company (BitHam), which manufactures and distributes hamster miners, is starting to get A LOT of orders from the same mining companies. Not gonna name any names, but you know who you are. @SanSAT and I are concerned that hamster mining is starting to fall into the same pattern of centralization that legacy ASIC mining has fallen victim to.
@SanSAT followed up:
Yeah seriously, we know Bitcoiners should be smarter than this. With ASIC mining, we got entire governments controlling 10% of the hashrate, there’s private ops and pools that individually have near enough 20% of the network, like y’all can’t possibly have forgotten that the whole point of Bitcoin was supposed to be DECENTRALIZATION. Unfortunately, Satoshi’s 1 CPU = 1 Vote is complete and utter BS now, that principle no longer exists. sorry if you’re a Satoshi Stan, but that’s the truth, don’t know what else to tell ya. We’re so proud and appreciate all the miners who have made an effort to support the hamster mining cause, but @UncleB and I as the creators of this project know its limits and the dangers if things start to become more centralized.
@UncleB replied:
The only reason we’re expanding production of hamster miners and encouraging more hamster breeding is because we see hamster mining as a long-term project, the new age of mining – we really think this could replace ASIC mining with the technology and AI algorithms we’ve developed. As supply increases, we promise the prices of hamsters and mining rigs will come down over time, not like ASICs which just keep getting more and more expensive. Hamster mining will be affordable to EVERYONE, not just large-scale mining operations that concentrate control of the network. So, to all the hamster miners out there, this is a warning. We’re not gonna make you hold your horses since we want this thing to grow. BUT – we want this thing to grow naturally, organically – remember that centralization is our enemy.
However, the large hamster mining operations SanSAT and Bitty were so clearly calling out simply didn’t care. All they wanted was what was best for them and their bank accounts, which meant buying up more mining rigs and more hamsters. Nothing was stopping them…all SanSAT and Bitty had done was put out a couple of silly tweets, right? So, as the number of hamster miners grew, so did the concentration of mining power among them. When hamster mining had grown to produce 48% of all Bitcoin hashpower, 75% of hamster mining hashpower was now controlled by those same three mining operations. SanSAT and Bitty were at a loss for words. They were two HUGE Bitcoin influencers, but that meant nothing now…the centralizing forces they were trying to fight were too great. However, instead of pouting like spoiled children who didn’t get their monthly allowances, the two went to work to devise a plan that was all but guaranteed to get them at least something out of this ordeal.
Step 1: Develop a softfork that is only compatible with the proprietary software on hamster mining rigs that forks the network to create a new coin (Bitcoin Hamster - $BHM)
Step 2: Wait for hamster mining to control over 51% of the Bitcoin network
Step 3: Broadcast the new softfork code to hamster miners
Step 4: Buy as much $BHM as possible when its price is “low
Step 5: Tweet all over about this newly softforked coin and watch $BHM blow up as a meme and spread like a wildfire, while the price goes to the moon.
Step 6: Get rich – cha ching
As expected, this plan worked to perfection. Hamster mining had already gained meme status on the internet (because who doesn’t like hamsters?), but as soon as hamster coin (what BHM was colloquially referred to as) popped up with SanSAT and Bitty blasting tweets nonstop about it and getting it listed on major crypto exchanges like Coinbase and Binance, the internet completely lost its sh*t. From the miners’ perspective, while there were different views on the centralization of hamster mining between the miners themselves and SanSAT and Bitty, one thing they could all agree on was that at some point, hamster mining needed more recognition – it needed to be its own thing, which it now was. BTC could still go on and remain as the world’s digital currency, but BHM’s meme power gave it all the attention in the world and sent BHM trading into a frenzy with the coin reaching 10x the value of Bitcoin at one point from both retail and institutional traders pumping the price up and up and up.
A few months later in June 2051, with billions of dollars of gains locked in and the price of BHM starting to stabilize, SanSAT and Bitty both decided to cash out of BHM. That lovely summer night, they FaceTime’d to congratulate each other on BHM’s massive success and admire how far hamster mining had come. Who woulda thought that any cryptocurrency, let alone a hamster-themed one, would overtake Bitcoin in size?? They knew that they’d never be able to lure every single person on earth away from BTC to BHM because there were far too many hardcore Bitcoiners and Satoshi stans who would remain faithful to BTC despite the higher value of BHM. Additionally, there was no way in hell that governments would start using a meme digital currency over one that had been established and battle-tested for nearly half a century. Regardless of what was next in store for BHM, SanSAT and Bitty were happy – they had made their money and contributed something extraordinary to society, and nothing could change that.
5 years later…
Up until this point, SanSAT and Bitty had thought well of the character and humanity of the broader hamster mining community based on conversations they had had with hamster miners previously over Twitter and at mining conferences. However, what they didn’t anticipate, was that with this new method of Bitcoin mining, greed could also potentially manifest itself in the inhumane treatment of mining hamsters, which involved working them beyond the GCC’s stated limit of 12 hours per day and not providing the hamsters with a healthy level of nutrition. However, as bad of a reputation that hamster coiners had in the past and their support for practically enslaving hamsters, these people aren't complete reprobates and still have some humanity left in them so they understand that they shouldn’t be working hamsters into the ground 24/7 due to the still delicate state of the hamster population…or so SanSAT and Bitty thought.
Without directly communicating with each other, they reached a consensus about the very basic principle to treat their hamsters “fairly” (in the context of using them for mining) and give the hamsters adequate breaks and nutrition. However, over time, with block rewards dwindling to less than one hundredth of a hamster coin by 2056 and the price of BHM only slowly increasing after the meme had been almost completely milked out by the internet, miners became desperate to keep their operations profitable. Some operations slowly begin to break away from the schelling point about treatment practices everyone had arrived at previously, reducing the food and water supply to hamsters and pushing the limits of hamsters by working them close to 20 hours each day to reduce costs and increase the number of hashes their operation could run in a day.
It is only until one fifth of all hamster mining operations are engaging in these cruel practices that SanSAT and Bitty catch wind of this growing trend. They warn the hamster coin community of the dangers of pursuing economic interests rather than mining “for the sake of hamster coin”. However, with the price of hamster coin breaking $6 million in 2058 and transaction fees skyrocketing to all-time highs, miners are unable to resist the urge to chase monetary gains. They put their mining operations into hyperdrive, pushing their hamsters and mining rigs to the limit. At this point, SanSAT and Bitty sense an imminent collapse of the system they had worked so hard to develop. However, greed has unfortunately taken control of miners and the pair sees no way of remediating the situation. They are accepting that things may crash and burn very soon and have no problem with letting that happen – it’s was just a meme anyways.
Unwilling to let their efforts go completely to waste, however, SanSAT and Bitty enter into massive short positions on hamster futures (the futures they lobbied to create) at the peak of the hamster market with the money they had made from the original hamster coin meme pump. Now that hamster mining has separated from Bitcoin and acts as a meme currency instead of a crucial cog of the global financial system, hamster mining is on much thinner ice with the GCC, which may take extreme action and shut things down if mining operations go awry. To make a case for themselves and in a way spread FUD about the state of hamster mining, SanSAT and Bitty post a 2-minute video to Twitter showing a timelapse of a hamster mining rig running for essentially 2 days straight (they replaced the active hamster every 6 hours). At 47 hours and 38 minutes, the mining rig explodes (which SanSAT and Bitty knew would happen because that’s basic computer hardware knowledge), unfortunately with a hamster in it. With this concrete evidence, SanSAT and Bitty were sure they had one last chance to get through to the miners before they gave up once and for all – who would want to be the reason a hamster dies in a fiery explosion? However, this only made things worse, sadly. Hamster miners were more determined than ever to prove SanSAT and Bitty wrong after the pair had seemed to start turning against their own community in recent years.
In the middle of a dark windy night in Los Angeles, one operation located on the outskirts of the city reaches it breaking point. The facility’s crew has filled its warehouse to the brim with malnourished hamsters and mining rigs that have not been inspected in weeks. One rig in the center of the warehouse begins to break down and starts smoking profusely, creating a widespread panic among the rest of the hamsters in the warehouse. The hamsters attempt to escape the cages that their hamster wheel rigs are locked in, causing hundreds of thousands of cages with screeching hamsters to topple over. Some hamsters are lucky and are able to escape, but others are trapped in a mangled pile of cages that is slowly going up in flames. Before emergency crew can arrive at the scene, the warehouse explodes, sending thousands of hamsters into the night sky for the whole city of Los Angeles to see. What they don’t know is that a huge swarm of hamsters is coming their way.
Overnight, the city of Los Angeles, which now has a population of over 10 million, becomes infested with hamsters, causing the city to descend into chaos and forcing a city-wide shut down. In the early waking hours of the morning, people would find hamsters crawling all over their homes and offices, gnawing through walls and sh*tting absolutely everywhere. It. Was. Chaos. At 9am, the following tweets from SanSAT and Bitty came out:
@SanSAT:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA f*ckers didn’t listen
@Bitty:
LMAOOOOOOOO how could you not see this coming?! BHM to the dirt
(To rub it in, Bitty had also posted a screenshot of his profits from shorting the hamster derivatives, which had collapsed after news of the incident broke)
Now it may seem unlikely that the founders of an extremely successful mining movement and cryptocurrency would laugh at the death of their own cryptocurrency, but BHM truly just turned out to be a meme and just like every other meme, it was inevitably going to die. Similar catastrophes occur at 8 other mining facilities before the GCC can take action and due to this series of horrific events, the GCC is forced to fold all other hamster mining facilities globally to prevent further chaos and thus ending hamster coin for good. BHM was delisted from all exchanges and with this nail in the coffin, both SanSAT and Bitty tweeted:
“We told ya so”, with the shrugging emoji