Spamvertising for Prentice Hall
This page lists repeated spams on behalf of Prentice Hall.
Among other things, this company apparently believes it
can be considered to have a prior business relationship with me
if it has sent me an unsolicited and unwanted free sample
of one of its textbooks.
-
October 1997: I received
this spam,
claiming to be from
Seth_H_Reichlin@prenhall.com
(or, according to the message body,
seth@prenhall.com)
advertising mathematics textbooks.
(The claim that I "teach Multivariable Calculus regularly"
is, as usual with spammers, a blatant lie.)
Complaining to the company brought the admission that the spammer knew
people would be annoyed, but went ahead and did it anyway.
I tracked down the authors of the spamvertised books,
herb@riemann.math.mun.ca,
rogers@math.mit.edu,
sjcolley@math.oberlin.edu,
and swami@math.mun.ca,
using the
American Mathematical
Society Combined Membership List,
but email to them brought either no response or merely platitudes.
-
September 2000: I got
this spam
claiming to be from
Math_Service@prenhall.com
or maybe
sreichli@prenhall.com
(according to the headers), and containing the email address
sara_bredbenner@prenhall.com.
My complaint this time led to email correspondence in which eventually
someone from the company seemed to be claiming that sending me an
unsolicted free sample created a prior business relationship with me!
Sam Spade
revealed this information
about the spamvertised site, including the contact address
hostmaster@PRENHALL.COM.
-
October 2003: I received
this spam
claiming to be from
Math_Service@prenhall.com,
also containing the email address
sara_bredbenner@prenhall.com.
They "appreciate" my considering a particular textbook.
As a result of their spam,
I am not considering this book.
-
March 2004: I received
this spam
claiming to be from
Math_Service@prenhall.com,
also containing the email address
sara_bredbenner@prenhall.com.
They sent me an unsolicted free sample of a statistics textbook,
and now send me spam asking what I think of it.
I will answer here:
this book is unacceptable because it is
promoted via spam.