cognitive dissonance - state of arousal or distress associated with inconsistent beliefs, or inconsistent beliefs and actions.

 

Festinger & Carlsmith (1959) -- APeg turning@ study

 

Resolving Dissonance:

- Change your behavior

- Change your belief

- Add additional justifications, cognitions

 

Inadequate justification -- decide we must like an activity because the external rewards are small (e.g., Festinger & Carlsmith)

Over-justification -- decide we are doing the task because of external rewards, not because we like it (e.g., paying kids for learning)

 

Aronson and Mills -- AInitiation@ study

Initiation Condition: Had to read obscene words out loud

Control: No initiation

Harsh initiation made members value group more.

 

 

Limitations on cognitive dissonance:

- must perceive behavior as freely chosen

- must affect self-concept

- must have important consequences for self or others

 

Nel, Helmreich, & Aronson

Anti -marijuana students asked to make pro-marijuana presentations to one of 2 audiences:

- people who had already made up their minds about pot

- people undecided about pot

Presenters showed more dissonance reduction (i.e., more pro-pot attitude change) when presenting to undecided

 

Aronson, Fried & Stone (1991) -- ASafe sex hypocrisy@ study:

College students who made videotape presentation for high school students about importance of safe sex showed more positive attitudes to practicing safe sex then students who merely composed arguments (but didn=t record them on videotape).

 

self-handicapping--creating obstacles and excuses for ourselves so that if we do poorly on a task, we have ready-made excuses.

 

Daryl Bem--

Self-perception theory: we infer our attitudes from our behavior.

 

Critiques of self-perception theory:

1) Often, we do know how we feel (e.g., evidence from previous behaviors, reports)

2) Doesn=t account for arousal that accompanies dissonance

 

Parsimony - simplicity

Usually, more parsimonious theory is favored over less parsimonious,

BUT! Theory can=t just ignore/not address phenomena in order be more parsimonious.

 

Steele, Southwick, and Critchlow (1981) -

alcohol reduces feelings of dissonance

 

Strack, Martin, & Stepper (1988)

Facial feedback/self perception effect: cartoons funnier when viewed with pencil clenched in teeth (creates a smile)

 

mere exposure effect: The more exposure we have to a stimulus, the more apt we are to like it

 

Mita, Dermer & Knight (1977) Mirror image/photo study: We prefer mirror image photos of ourselves 

Zajonc (ZY-onz): We don=t have to be aware of exposure for it to have an effect

Bornstein, Leone & Galley (1987) -

mere exposure (even subliminal exposure) increases liking

 

Practice question:

Based on Bornstein, Leone & Galley=s 1987 study, if an experimenter subliminally flashed photographs of one person at research participants, and then had participants interact with the person in the flashed photographs and another person who was not pictured in the photographs,

  1. Participants will like both people equally well
  2. Only those participants who realized they had seen photographs of one person but not the other would show a preference for the person in the photographs
  3. Participants will like the person they saw in the photographs better
  4. Participants will like the person they didn=t see in the photographs better