APOLOGIA OF ST JOHN DAMASCENE AGAINST
THOSE WHO DECRY HOLY IMAGES.
PART III*
EVERY one must recognise that a man who attempts to dishonour an image
which has been set up for the glory and remembrance of Christ, of His holy
Mother, or one of his saints, is an enemy of Christ, of His holy Mother,
and the saints. It is also set up to shame the devil and his crew, out
of love and zeal for God. The man who refuses to give this image due, though
not divine, honour, is an upholder of the devil and his demon host, showing
by his act grief that God and the saints are honoured and glorified, and
the devil put to shame. The image is a canticle and manifestation and monument
to the memory of those who have fought bravely and won the victory to the
shame and confusion of the vanquished. I have often seen lovers gazing
at the loved [88] one's garment, and embracing it with eyes and mouth as
if it was himself. We must give his due to every man, St Paul says "Honour
to whom honour: to the king as excelling: or to governors as sent by him,"
(Rom. 13.7) to each according to the measure of his dignity.
Where do you find in the Old Testament or in the Gospel the Trinity,
or consubstantiality, or one Godhead, or three persons,*
or the one substance of Christ, or His two natures, expressed in so many
words? Still, as they are contained in what Scripture does say,
and defined by the holy fathers, we receive them and anathematise those
who do not. I prove to you that in the old law God commanded images to
be made, first of all the tabernacle and everything in it. Then in the
gospel our Lord Himself said to those who asked Him, tempting, whether
it was lawful to give tribute to Caesar, "Bring me a coin," and they showed
Him a penny. And He asked them whose likeness it was, and they said to
Him, Caesar's; and He said, "Give to Caesar that which is Caesar's, and
to God that which is God's." (Mt. 22.17-21) As the coin bears the likeness
of Caesar, it is his, [89] and you should give it to Caesar. So the image
bears the likeness of Christ, and you should give it Him, for it is His.
Our Lord called His disciples blessed, saying, "Many kings and prophets
have desired to see what you see, and have not seen it, and to hear what
you hear and have not heard it. Blessed are your eyes which see and your
ears which hear." (Mt. 13.16-17) The apostles saw Christ with their bodily
eyes, and His sufferings and wonders, and they listened to His words. We,
too, desire to see, and to hear, and to be blessed. They saw Him face to
face, as He was present in the body. Now, since he is not present in the
body to us, we hear His words from books and are sanctified in spirit by
the hearing, and are blessed, and we adore, honouring the books which tell
us of His words. So, through the representation of images we look upon
His bodily form, and upon His miracles and His sufferings, and are sanctified
and satiated, gladdened and blessed. Reverently we worship His bodily form,
and contemplating it, we form some notion of His divine glory. For, as
we are composed of [90] soul and body, and our soul does not stand alone,
but is, as it were, shrouded by a veil, it is impossible for us to arrive
at intellectual conceptions without corporeal things. just as we listen
with our bodily ears to physical words and understand spiritual things,
so, through corporeal vision, we come to the spiritual. On this account
Christ took a body and a soul, as man has both one and the other. And baptism
likewise is double, of water and the spirit. So is communion and prayer
and psalmody; everything has a double signification, a corporeal and a
spiritual. Thus again, with lights and incense. The devil has tolerated
all these things, raising a storm against images alone. His great jealousy
of them may be learnt by what St Sophronius, Patriarch of Jerusalem, recounts
in his "Spiritual Garden." Abbot Theodore Aeliotes told of a holy hermit
on the Mount of Olives, who was much troubled by the demon of fornication.
One day when he was sorely tempted, the old man began to complain bitterly.
"When will you let me alone?" he said to the devil "be gone from me! you
and I have grown old together." The devil appeared to him, saying, [91]
"Swear to me that you will keep what I am about to tell you to yourself,
and I will not trouble you any longer." And the old man swore it. Then
the devil said to him, "Do not worship this image, and I will not harass
you." The image in question represented Our Lady, the holy Mother of God,
bearing in her arms our Lord Jesus Christ. You see what those who forbid
the worship of images hate in reality, and whose instruments they are.
The demon of fornication strove to prevent the worship of Our Lady's image
rather than to tempt the old man to impurity. He knew that the former evil
was greater than fornication.
As we are treating of images and their worship, let us draw out the
meaning more accurately and say in the first place what an image is; (2)
Why
the image was made; (3) How many kinds of images there are; (4) What may
be expressed by an image, and what may not; (5) Who first made images.
Again, as to worship: (1) What is worship; (2) How many kinds of worship
there are; (3) What are the things worshipped in Scripture; (4) That all
worship is for God, who is worshipful by nature; (5) That [92] honour shown
to the image is given to the original.
1st Point.--What is an Image?
An image is a likeness and representation of some one, containing in itself
the person who is imaged. The image is not wont to be an exact reproduction
of the original. The image is one thing, the person represented another;
a difference is generally perceptible, because the subject of each is the
same. For instance, the image of a man may give his bodily form, but not
his mental powers. It has no life, nor does it speak or feel or move. A
son being the natural image of his father is somewhat different from him,
for he is a son, not a father.
2nd Point.-For what purpose the Image is made.
Every image is a revelation and representation of something hidden. For
instance, man has not a clear knowledge of what is invisible, the spirit
being veiled to the body, nor of future things, nor of things apart and
distant, because he is circumscribed by place and time. [93] The image
was devised for greater knowledge, and for the manifestation and popularising
of secret things, as a pure benefit and help to salvation, so that by showing
things and making them known, we may arrive at the hidden ones, desire
and emulate what is good, shun and hate what is evil.
3rd Point.-How many kinds of Images there are.
Images are of various kinds. First there is the natural image. In everything
the natural conception must be the first, then we come to institution according
to imitation. The Son is the first natural and unchangeable image of the
invisible God, the Father, showing the Father in Himself. "For no man has
seen God." (Jn. 1.18) Again, "Not that any one has seen the Father." (Jn.
6.46) The apostle says that the Son is the image of the Father: "Who is
the image of the invisible God," (Col. 1.15) and to the Hebrews, "Who being
the brightness of His glory, and the figure of His substance." (Heb. 1.3)
In the Gospel of St John we find that He does
show the Father in
Himself. When Philip said to Him, "Show us the Father and it is enough
for us," [94] our Lord replied, "Have I been so long with you and have
you not known Me, Philip? He who sees Me, sees the Father." (Jn. 14.8-9)
For the Son is the natural image of the Father, unchangeable, in everything
like to the Father, except that He is begotten, and that He is not the
Father. The Father begets, being unbegotten. The Son is begotten, and is
not the Father, and the Holy Spirit is the image of the Son. For no one
can say the Lord Jesus, except in the Holy Spirit. (I Cor. 12.3) Through
the Holy Spirit we know Christ, the Son of God and God, and in the Son
we look upon the Father. For in things that are conceived by nature,*
language is the interpreter, and spirit is the interpreter of language.
The Holy Spirit is the perfect and unchangeable image of the Son, differing
only in His procession. The Son is begotten, but does not proceed. And
the son of any father is his natural image. Thus, the natural is the first
kind of image.
The second kind of image is that foreknowledge which is in God's mind
concerning future events, His eternal and unchanging counsel. God is immutable
and His counsel [95] without beginning, and as it has been determined from
all eternity, it is carried out at the time preordained by Him. Images
and figures of what He is to do in the future, the distinct determination
of each, are called predeterminations by holy Dionysius. In His counsels
the things predetermined by Him were characterised and imaged and immutably
fixed before they took place.
The third sort of image is that by imitation (kata
mimhsin) which God made, that is, man. For how can what is created
be of the same nature as what is uncreated, except by imitation? As mind,
the Father, the Word, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are one God, so mind
and word and spirit are one man, according to God's will and sovereign
rule.
For God says: "Let us make man according to our own image and likeness,"
and He adds, "I and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea and
the birds of the air, and the whole earth, and rule over it." (Gen. 1.26)
The fourth kind of image are the figures and types set forth by Scripture
of invisible and immaterial things in bodily form, for a clearer apprehension
of God and the angels, [96] through our incapacity of perceiving immaterial
things unless clothed in analogical material form, as Dionysius the Areopagite
says, a man skilled in divine things. Anyone would say that our incapacity
for reaching the contemplation of intellectual things, and our need of
familiar and cognate mediums, make it necessary that immaterial things
should be clothed in form and shape. If, then, holy Scripture adapts itself
to us in seeking to elevate us above sense, does it not make images of
what it clothes in our own medium, and bring within our reach that which
we desire but are unable to see? The spiritual*
writer, Gregory, says that the mind striving to banish corporeal images
reduces itself to incapability. But from the creation of the world the
invisible things of God are made clear by the visible creation. We see
images in created things, which remind us faintly of divine tokens. For
instance, sun and light and brightness, the running waters of a perennial
fountain, our own mind and language and spirit, the sweet fragrance of
a flowering rose tree, are images of the Holy and Eternal Trinity.
[97] The fifth kind of image is that which is typical of the future,
as the bush and the fleece, the rod and the urn, foreshadowing the Virginal
Mother of God, and the serpent healing through the Cross those bitten by
the serpent of old. Thus, again, the sea, and water and the cloud foreshadow
the grace of baptism.
The sixth kind of image is for a remembrance of past events, of a miracle
or a good deed, for the honour and glory and abiding memory of the most
virtuous, or for the shame and terror of the wicked, for the benefit of
succeeding generations who contemplate it, so that we may shun evil and
do good. This image is of two kinds, either through the written word in
books, for the word represents the thing, as when God ordered the law to
be written on tablets, (Deut. 5.22) and the lives of God-fearing men to
be recorded, (Ex. 17.14) or through a visible object, as when He commanded
the urn and rod to be placed in the ark for a lasting memory, (Ex, 16.33-34;
Num. 17.10) and the names of the tribes to be engraved on the stones of
the humeral. (Ex. 28.11-12) And also He commanded the twelve stones to
be taken from the Jordan as a sacred token. (Jos. 4.20ff) Consider the
prodigy, the greatest which befell [98] the faithful people, the taking
of the ark, and the parting of the waters. So now we set up the images
of valiant men for an example and a remembrance to ourselves. Therefore,
either reject all images, and be in opposition to Him who ordered these
things, or receive each and all with becoming greeting and manner.
Fourth Chapter. What an Image is, what it is not; and how each Image is
to be set forth.
Bodies as having form and shape and colour, may properly be represented
in image. Now if nothing physical or material may be attributed to an angel,
a spirit, and a devil, yet they may be depicted and circumscribed after
their own nature. Being intellectual beings, they are believed to be present
and to energise in places known to us intellectually. They are represented
materially as Moses made an image of the cherubim who were looked upon
by those worthy of the honour, the material image offering them an immaterial
and intellectual sight. Only the divine nature is uncircumscribed and incapable
of being represented in form or shape, and incomprehensible.
[99] If Holy Scripture clothes God in figures which are apparently material,
and can even be seen, they are still immaterial. They were seen by the
prophets and those to whom they were revealed, not with bodily but with
intellectual eyes. They were not seen by all. In a word it may be said
that we can make images of all the forms which we see. We apprehend these
as if they were seen. If at times we understand types from reasoning, and
also from what we see, and arrive at their comprehension in this way, so
with every sense, from what we have smelt, or tasted, or touched, we arrive
at apprehension by bringing our reason to bear upon our experience.
We know that it is impossible to look upon God, or a spirit, or a demon,
as they are. They are seen in a certain form, divine providence clothing
in type and figure what is without substance or material being, for our
instruction, and more intimate knowledge, lest we should be in too great
ignorance of God, and of the spirit world. For God is a pure Spirit by
His nature. The angel, and a soul, and a demon, compared to God, who alone
is incomparable, are bodies; but compared to material [100] bodies, they
are bodiless. God therefore, not wishing that we should be in ignorance
of spirits, clothed them in type and figure, and in images akin to our
nature, material forms visible to the mind in mental vision. These we put
into form and shape, for how were the cherubim represented and described
in image? But Scripture offers forms and images even of God.
Who first made an Image.
In the beginning God begot His only begotten Son, His word, the living
image of Himself, the natural and unchangeable image of His eternity. And
He made man after His own image and likeness. (Gen. 1.26) And Adam saw
God, and heard the sound of His feet as He walked at even, and he hid in
paradise. (Gen. 3.8) And Jacob saw and struggled with God. It is evident
that God appeared to him in the form of a man. (Gen. 32.24ff) And Moses
saw as it were the back of a man, (Ex. 33.24ff) and Isaias saw Him as a
man seated on a throne. (Is. 6.1) And Daniel saw the likeness of a man,
and as the Son of Man coming to the ancient of days. (Dan. 7.9, 13) No
one saw the nature of God, but the type and image of what, was to be. For
the Son and Word of [101] the invisible God, was to become man in truth,
that He might be united to our nature, and be seen upon earth. Now all
who looked upon the type and image of the future, worshipped it, as St
Paul says in his epistle to the Hebrews: "All these died according to faith,
not having received the promises, but beholding them afar off, and saluting
them." (Heb. 11.13) Shall I not make an image of Him who took the nature
of flesh for me? Shall I not reverence and worship Him, through the honour
and worship of His image? Abraham saw not the nature of God, for no man
ever saw God, but the image of God, and falling down he adored. (Gen. 18.2)
Josue saw the image of an angel, (Jos. 5.14) not as he is, for an angel
is not visible to bodily eyes, and falling down he adored, and so did Daniel.
Yet an angel is a creature, and servant, and minister of God, not God.
And he worshipped the angel not as God, but as God's ministering spirit.
And shall not I make images of Christ's friends? And shall I not worship
them as the images of God's friends, not as gods? Neither Josue nor Daniel
worshipped the angels they saw as gods. Neither do I worship the image
as God, but through [102] the image of the saints too, show my worship
to God, because I honour His friends, and do them reverence. God did not
unite Himself to the angelic nature, but to the human. He did not become
an angel: He became a man in nature, and in truth. It is indeed Abraham's
seed which He embraces, not the angel's. (Heb. 2.16)
The Son of God in person did not take the nature of the angels: He took
the nature of man. The angels did not participate in the divine nature,
but in working and in grace. Now, men do participate, and become
partakers of the divine nature when they receive the holy Body of Christ
and drink His Blood. For He is united in person to the Godhead,*
and two natures in the Body of Christ shared by us are united indissolubly
in person, and we partake of the two natures, of the body bodily, and of
the Godhead in spirit, or, rather, of each in both. We are made one, not
in person, for first we have a person and then we are [103] united by blending
together the body and the blood. How are we not greater than the angels,
if through fidelity to the commandments we keep this perfect union? In
itself our nature is far removed from the angels, on account of death and
the heaviness of the body, but through God's goodness and its union with
Him it has become higher than the angels. For angels stand by that nature
with fear and trembling, as, in the person of Christ, it sits upon a throne
of glory, and they will stand by in trembling at the judgment. According
to Scripture they are not partakers of the divine glory. For they are all
ministering spirits, being sent to minister because of those who are to
be heirs of salvation, (Heb. 1.14) not that they shall reign together,
nor that they shall be together glorified, nor that they shall sit at the
table of the Father. The saints, on the contrary, are the children of God,
the children of the kingdom, heirs of God, and co-heirs of Christ. (Rom.
8.17) Therefore, I honour the saints, and glorify the servants and friends
and co-heirs of Christ servants by nature, friends by their choice friends
and co-heirs by divine grace, as our Lord said in speaking to the Father.
(Jn. 17)
[104] As we are peaking of images, let us speak of worship also, and
in the first place determine what it is.
On Adoration. What is Adoration?
Adoration is a token of subjection,--that is of submission and humiliation.
There are many kinds of adoration.
On the kinds of Adoration.
The first kind is the worship of latreia, which we give to God, who alone
is adorable by nature, and this worship is shown in several ways, and first
by the worship of servants. All created things worship Him, as servants
their master. "All things serve Thee," (Ps. 119.91) the psalm says. Some
serve willingly, others unwillingly; some with full knowledge, willingly,
as in the case of the devout, others knowing, but not willing, against
their will, as the devil's. Others, again, not knowing the true God, worship
in spite of themselves Him whom they do not know.
The second kind is the worship of admiration and desire which we give
to God on account of His essential glory. He alone is worthy of praise,
who receives it from no one, being Himself the cause of all glory and all
good, [105] He is light, incomprehensible sweetness, incomparable, immeasurable
perfection, an ocean of goodness, boundless wisdom, and power, who alone
is worthy of Himself to excite admiration, to be worshipped, glorified,
and desired.
The third kind of worship is that of thanksgiving for the goods we have
received. We must thank God for all created things, and show Him perpetual
worship, as from Him and through Him all creation takes its being and subsists.
(Col. 1.16-17) He gives lavishly of His gifts to all, and without being
asked. He wishes all to be saved, (I Tim. 2.4) and to partake of His goodness.
He is long-suffering with us sinners. He allows His sun to shine upon the
just and unjust, and His rain to fall upon the wicked and the good alike.
(Mt. 5.45) And being the Son of God, He became one of us for our sakes,
and made us partakers of His divine nature, so that "we shall be like unto
Him," (I Jn. 3.2) as St John says in his Catholic epistle.
The fourth kind is suggested by the need and hope of benefits. Recognising
that without Him we can neither do nor possess anything good, we worship
Him, asking Him to satisfy [106] our needs and desires, that we may be
preserved from evil and arrive at good.
The fifth kind is the worship of contrition and confession. As sinners
we worship God, and prostrate ourselves before Him, needing His forgiveness,
as it becomes servants. This happens in three ways. A man may be sorry
out of love, or lest he should lose God's benefits, or for fear of chastisement.
The first is prompted by goodness and desire for God himself, and the condition
of a son: the second is interested, the third is slavish.
What we find worshipped in Scripture, and in how many ways we show worship
to creatures
First, those places in which God, who alone is holy, has rested, and His
resting-place in the saints, as in the holy Mother of God and in all the
saints. These are they who are made like to God as far as possible, of
their own free will, and by God's indwelling, and by His abiding grace.
They are truly called gods, not by nature, but by participation; just as
red-hot iron is called fire, not by nature, but by participation in the
fire's action. He says: [107] "Be ye holy because I am holy." (Lev. 19.2)
The first thing is the free choice of the will. Then, in the case of a
good choice, God helps it on and confirms it. "I will take up my abode
in them," (Lev. 26.12) He says. "We are the temples of God, and the Spirit
of God dwells in us." (I Cor. 3.16) Again, "He gave them power over unclean
spirits, to cast them out, and to heal all manner of diseases, and all
manner of infirmities." (Mt. 10.1) And again, "That which I do you shall
do, and greater things." (Jn. 14.12) Again: "As I live, God says, whosoever
shall glorify Me, him will I glorify." (I Sam. 2.30) Again: "If we suffer
with Him that we may be also glorified with Him. (Rom. 8.17) And "God stood
in the synagogue of the gods; in the midst of it He points out the gods."
(Ps. 82.1) As, then, they are truly gods, not by nature, but as partakers
of God's nature, so they are to be worshipped, not as worshipful on
their own account, but as possessing in themselves Him who is
worshipful by nature. Just in the same way iron when ignited is not by
nature hot and burning to the touch, it is the fire which makes it so.
They are worshipped as exalted by God, as through Him inspiring fear to
His enemies, and becoming benefactors to the faithful. It is love [108]
of God which gives them their free access to Him, not as gods or benefactors
by nature, but as servants and ministers of God. We worship them, then,
as the king is honoured through the honour given to a loved servant. He
is honoured as a minister in attendance upon his master--as a valued friend,
not as king. The prayers of those who approach with faith are heard, whether
through the servant's intercession with the king, or whether through the
king's acceptance of the honour and faith shown by the servant's petitioner,
for it was in his name that the petition was made. Thus, those who approached
through the apostles obtained their cures. Thus the shadow, and winding-sheets,
and girdles of the apostles worked healings. (Acts 5.15) Those who perversely
and profanely wish them to be adored as gods are themselves damnable, and
deserve eternal fire. And those who in the false pride of their hearts
disdain to worship God's servants are convicted of impiety towards God.
The children who derided and laughed to scorn Elisseus bear witness to
this, inasmuch as they were devoured by bears. (II Kgs. 2.23)
Secondly, we worship creatures by [109] honouring those places or persons
whom God has associated with the work of our salvation, whether before
our Lord's coming or since the dispensation of His incarnation. For instance,
I venerate Mount Sinai, Nazareth, the stable at Bethlehem, and the cave,
the sacred mount of Golgotha, the wood of the Cross, the nails and sponge
and reed, the sacred and saving lance, the dress and tunic, the linen cloths,
the swathing clothes, the holy tomb, the source of our resurrection, the
sepulchre, the holy mountain of Sion and the mountain of Olives, the Pool
of Bethsaida and the sacred garden of Gethsemane, and all similar spots.
I cherish them and every holy temple of God, and everything connected with
God's name, not on their own account but because they show forth the divine
power, and through them and in them it pleased God to bring about our salvation.
I venerate and worship angels and men, and all matter participating in
divine power and ministering to our salvation through it. I do not worship
the Jews. They are not participators in divine power, nor have they contributed
to my salvation. They crucified my God, the King of [110] Glory, moved
rather by envy and hatred against God their Benefactor. "Lord, I have loved
the beauty of Thy house," (Ps. 26.8) says David, "we will adore in the
place where his feet stood. And adore at His holy mountain." (Ps. 132.7;
99.9) The holy Mother of God is the living holy mountain of God. The apostles
are the teaching mountains of God. "The mountains skipped like rams, and
the hills like the lambs of the flock." (I Cor. 10.11)
The third kind of worship is directed to objects dedicated to God, as,
for instance, the holy Gospels and other sacred books. They were written
for our instruction who live in these latter days. Sacred vessels, again,
chalices, thuribles, candelabra, and altars (trapezai)
belong to this category. It is evident that respect is due to them all.
Consider how Baltassar made the people use the sacred vessels, and how
God took away his kingdom from him. (Dan. 5.2ff)
The fourth kind of worship is that of images seen by the prophets. They
saw God in sensible vision, and images of future things, as Aaron's rod,
the figure of Our Lady's virginity, the urn, and the table. And Jacob worshipped
[111] on the point (epi to akron) of his rod.
(Gen. 47.31) He was a type of our Lord. Images of past events recall their
remembrance. The tabernacle was an image of the whole world. "See," God
said to Moses, "the type which was shown to thee on the mountain, and the
golden cherubim, the work of sculpturers, and the cherubim within the veil
of woven work." (Ex. 25.40) Thus we adore the sacred figure of the Cross,
the likeness of our God's bodily features, the likeness of her who bore
Him, and all belonging to Him.
The fifth manner is in the worship of each other as having upon us the
mark of God and being made after His image, humbling ourselves mutually,
(Eph. 5.21) and so fulfilling the law of charity.
The sixth manner is the worship of those in power who have authority.
"Give to all men their dues," the apostle says; "give honour where it is
due." (Rom. 13.7) This Jacob did in worshipping Esau as his elder brother,
and Pharao the ruler established by God.
In the seventh place, the worship of servants towards their masters
and benefactors, and of petitioners towards those who grant their favours,
as in the case of Abraham when he [112] bought the double cave from the
sons of Emmor. (Gen. 23.7, 12)
It is needless to say that fear, desire, and honour are tokens of worship,
as also submission and humiliation. No one should be worshipped as God
except the one true God. Whatever is due to all the rest is for God's sake.
You see what great strength and divine zeal are given to those who venerate
the images of the saints with faith and a pure conscience. Therefore, brethren,
let us take our stand on the rock of the faith, and on the tradition of
the Church, neither removing the boundaries laid down by our holy fathers
of old, (Prov. 22.28) nor listening to those who would introduce innovation
and destroy the economy of the holy Catholic and Apostolic Church of God.
If any man is to have his foolish way, in a short time the whole Organisation
of the Church will be reduced to nothing. Brethren and beloved children
of the Church do not put your mother to shame, do not rend her to pieces.
Receive her teaching through me. Listen to what God says of her: "Thou
art all fair, O my love, and there is not a spot in thee." (Cant. 4.7)
Let us worship and adore our [113] God and Creator as alone worthy of worship
by nature, and let us worship the holy Mother of God, not as God, but as
God's Mother according to the flesh. Let us worship the saints also, as
the chosen friends of God, and as possessing access to Him. If men worship
kings subject to corruption, who are often bad and impious, and those ruling
or deputed in their name, as the holy apostle says, "Be subject to princes
and powers," (Tit. 3.1) and again, "Give to all their due, to one honour,
to another fear," (Rom. 13.7) and our Lord, "Give to Caesar that which
is Caesar's, and to God that which is God's," (Mt. 22.21) how much more
should we worship the King of Kings? He alone is God by nature; and we
should worship His servants and friends who reign over their passions and
are constituted rulers of the whole earth. "Thou shalt make them princes
over all the earth," (Ps. 45.16) says David. They receive power against
demons and against disease, (Lk. 9.1) and with Christ they reign over an
incorruptible and unchangeable kingdom. Their shadow alone has put forth
disease and demons. (Acts 5.16) Should we not deem a shadow a slighter
and weaker thing than an image? Yet it is a true outline of the [114] original.
Brethren, the Christian is faith.* He who
walks by faith gains many things. The doubter, on the contrary, is as a
wave of the sea torn and tossed; he profits nothing. (Jam. 1.6) All the
saints pleased God by faith. Let us then receive the teaching of the Church
in simplicity of heart without questioning. God made man sane and sound.
It was man who was over curious. (Eccl. 7.30) Let us not seek to learn
a new faith, destructive of ancient tradition, St Paul says, "If a man
teach any other Gospel than what he has been taught, let him be anathema."
(Gal. 1.9) Thus, we worship images, and it is not a worship of matter,
but of those whom matter represents. The honour given to the image is referred
to the original, as holy Basil rightly says.
And may Christ fill you with the joy of His resurrection, most holy
flock of Christ, Christian people, chosen race, body of the Church, and
make you worthy to walk in the footsteps of the saints, of the shepherds
and teachers of the Church, leading you to enjoy His glory in the brightness
of the saints. May you gain His glory for eternity, with the [115] Uncreated
Father, to whom be praise for ever. Amen.
Speaking on the distinction between images and idols, and defining what
images are, it is time to give proofs in question, according to our promise.*
[116] TESTIMONY OF ANCIENT AND LEARNED FATHERS CONCERNING IMAGES.
St Denis, Bishop of Athens, from his letter to St John the Apostle and
Evangelist.
Sensible images do indeed show forth invisible things.
The same, from his Homily on the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy.
The substances and orders to which we have already alluded with reverence,
are spirits, and they are set forth in spiritual and immaterial array.
We can see it when brought down to [117] our medium, symbolised in various
forms, by which we are led up to the mental contemplation of God and divine
goodness. Spirits think of Him as spirits according to their nature, but
we are led as far as may be by sensible images to the divine contemplation.
Commentary.-If, then, we are led by the medium of sensible
images to divine contemplation, what unseemliness is there in making an
image of Him Who was seen in the form, and habit, and nature of man for
our sakes?
St Basil, from his Homily on the Forty Martyrs.
The fortunes of war are wont to supply matter both for orators and painters.
Orators describe them in glowing language, painters depict them on their
canvas, and both have led many on to deeds of fortitude. That which words
are to the ear, that the silent picture points out for imitation.
The same, on the Thirty Chapters on the Holy Ghost to Amphilochios,
18th Answer.
The image of the king is also called the king, and there are not two kings.
Neither power [118] is broken, nor is glory divided. As we are ruled by
one government and authority, so our homage is one, not many. Thus the
honour given to the image is referred to the original. That which the image
represents by imitation on earth, that the Son is by nature in Heaven.
Commentary.-Just, then, as "he who does not honour the
Son does not honour the Father who sent Him," (Jn. 5.23) as our Lord says,
so he who does not honour the image does not honour the original. Still
some one says, "We cannot refuse to honour the image of Christ, but we
will not have the saints." What folly! Listen to what our Lord says to
His disciples: "He who receives you receives Me," (Mt. 10.40) so that the
man who does not honour the saints does not honour Christ either.
St John Chrysostom, from his "Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews."
How can what precedes be an image of what follows, as, for instance, Melchisedech
of Christ? just in the same way as a sketch would be an outline of the
picture. On this account the old law is called a shadow, and the new-the
truth and what is to come-certainties. Thus [119] Melchisedech, who represents
the law, is a foreshadowing of the picture. The new dispensation is the
truth; the picture fully completed shows forth eternity. We might call
the old dispensation a type of a type, and the new a type of the things
themselves.
From the Spiritual History of Theodore, Bishop of Cyrus. From the "Life
of St Simon Stylites."
It is superfluous to speak of Italy. They say that this man became so well
known in the great city of Rome, that small statues were erected to him
in all the porticos of workshops, as a certain protection to them, and
a guarantee of security.
St Basil, from his "Commentary on Isaias."
When the devil saw man made after God's image and likeness, as he
could not fight against God, he vented his wickedness on the image of God.
In the same way an angry man might stone the King's image, because he cannot
stone the King, striking the wood which bears his likeness.
Commentary.-Thus, every man who honours the image
must necessarily honour the original.
[120] The same.
Just as the man who shows contempt for the royal image is held to show
it for the King himself, so is he convicted of sin who shows contempt for
man made after an image.
St Athanasius, from the Hundred Chapters addressed to Antiochus, the
Prefect, according to Question and Answer.--Chap. xxxviii.
Answer.-We, who are of the faithful, do not worship images
as gods, as the heathens did, God forbid, but we mark our loving desire
alone to see the face of the person represented in image. Hence, when it
is obliterated, we are wont to throw the image as so much wood into the
fire. Jacob, when he was about to die, worshipped on the point of Joseph’s
staff, not honouring the staff but its owner. just in the same way do we
greet images as we should embrace our children and parents to signify our
affection. Thus the Jew, too, worshipped the tablets of the law, and the
two golden cherubim in carved work, not [121] because he honoured gold
or stone for itself, but the Lord who had ordered them to be made.
St John Chrysostom, on the "Third Psalm, on David, and Absalom."
Kings put victorious trophies before their conquering generals; rulers
erect proud monuments to their charioteers, and brave men, and with the
epitaph as a crown, use matter for their triumph. Others, again, write
the praises of conquerors in books, wishing to show that their own gift
in praising is greater than those praised. And orators and painters, sculpturers
and people, rulers, and cities, and places acclaim the victorious. No one
ever made images of the deserter or the coward.
St Cyril of A1exandria, from his "Address to the Emperor Theodosius."
If images represent the originals, they should call forth the same reverence.
The same, from his "Treasures."
Images are ever the likenesses of their originals.
[122] The same, from his Poem, on the "Revelation of Christ being signified
through all the Teaching of Moses. On Abraham and Melchisedech."--Chap.
vi.
Images should be made after their originals.
St Gregory of Nazianzen, from His Sermon on the "Son," ii.
An image is essentially a representation of its original.
St Chrysostom, from his Third "Commentary on the Colossians."
The image of what is invisible, were it also invisible, would cease to
be an image. An image, as far as it is an image, should be kept inviolably
by us, owing to the likeness it represents.
The same, from his "Commentary on the Hebrews."-Chap. xvii.
As in images the image presents the form of a man, though not his strength,
so the original and the likeness have much in common, for the likeness
is the man.
[123] Eusebius Pamphilius, from the Fifth Book of his Gospel Proofs,
on "God appeared to Abraham by the Oak of Mambre."
Hence, even now the inhabitants cherish the place where visions appeared
to Abraham, (Gen 18.1) as divinely consecrated. The turpentine tree is
still to be seen, and those who received Abraham's hospitality are painted
in picture, one on each side, and the stranger of greatest dignity in the
middle. He would be an image of our Lord and Saviour, whom even rude men
reverence, Whose divine words they believe. It was He who, through Abraham,
sowed the seeds of piety in men. In the likeness and habit of an ordinary
man He presented himself to Abraham,* and
gave him knowledge of His Father.
John of Antioch, also called Malala, from his Chronography concerning
the "Woman with the Issue of Blood, who erected a Monument to Christ."
From that time John the Baptist became known to men, and Herod, toparcha
of the [124] Trachonitis region beheaded him in the city of Sebaste, on
the eighth day of the kalends of June, Flaccus and Ruffinus being consuls.
King Herod, Philip's son, in grief at this event, left Judea. A rich woman,
Berenice by name, who was also living at Paneada, sought him out wishing
as she had been cured by Jesus, to erect a monument to Him. Not daring
to do it without the king's consent, she presented a petition to King Herod,
asking to be allowed to erect a golden monument in that city to our Lord.
The petition ran thus:--
To the august Herod, toparcha, law-giver of Jews and Greeks, King of
Trachonitis, a suppliant petition from Berenice, an inhabitant of Paneada.
You are crowned with justice and mercy and all other virtues. Knowing this
and in good hope of success, I am writing to you. If you read my beginning
you will soon be instructed as to facts. From child hood I suffered with
an issue of blood, and spent my time and my substance on doctors, and was
not cured. Hearing of the wonderworking Christ, how He raised the dead
to life again, put forth devils, and cured the sick by one word, I also
went to Him as to [125] God. And approaching the crowd which surrounded
Him fearing lest He should turn me away in anger on account of my complaint,
and that I should feel it more, I said to myself, "If I could only touch
the border of His garment, I should be cured." I had no sooner touched
it than the hemorrhage stopped, and I was cured on the spot. And He, as
if He had read my heart's desire, said aloud, "Who has touched Me? Power
has gone out of Me!" And I pale and trembling, thinking to throw off my
sickness the sooner, prostrated myself at His feet, bathing the ground
with my tears, and confessed my action. He in His goodness compassionating
me, assured me of my cure, saying: "Be of good heart, daughter, thy faith
has healed thee. Go in peace!" Do you now, august ruler, grant my righteous
petition. King Herod receiving this petition, was struck with wonder and
in awe at the cure, replied: "The cure wrought for you, O woman, deserves
a splendid monument. Go then and put up any memorial you like to Him, in
praise of the Healer." And immediately Berenice the sick woman of yore,
set up in the midst of her own city of Paneada a monument in bronze, [126]
adorned with gold and silver. It is still standing in the city of Paneada.
Not long ago it was taken from the place where it stood to the middle of
the city, and placed in a house of prayer. One, Batho, a converted Jew,
found it mentioned in a book which contained an account of all those who
had reigned over Judea.
From the "Ecclesiastical History of Socrates," Book 1. Chap. xviii.,
on the Emperor Constantine.
After this the Emperor Constantine, being most zealous for the Christian
religion, destroyed heathen observances, and prohibited single combats,
whilst he set up his images in the temples.
Stephen Bostrenus, against the Jews.--Chap. iv.
We have made the images of the saints for a remembrance of Abraham, Isaac,
Jacob, Moses, and Elias and Zachary, and of other prophets and holy martyrs,
who gave their life for Him. Every one who looks at their images may thus
be reminded of them and glorify Him who glorifies them.
[127] The same.
As to images let us take courage that every work done in God's name is
good and holy. Now as to idols and statues, beware, they are all bad, both
the things and their makers. An image of a holy prophet is one thing, a
statue or carved figure of Saturn or Venus, the sun or the moon, quite
another. As man was made after God's image, he is worshipped; but the serpent
as the image of the devil, is unclean and execrable. Tell me, O Jew, if
you reject man's handiwork, what is left on earth to be worshipped which
is not the work of his hand? Was not the ark made by hands, and the altar,
the propitiatory and the cherubim, the golden urn containing the manna,
the table and the inner tabernacle, and all that God ordered to be put
in the holy of Holies? Were not the cherubim the images of angels made
by hands? Do you call them idols? What do you say to Moses who worshipped
them and to Israel? Worship is symbolical of honour, and we sinners worship
God, and glorify Him by the divine worship of latreia which is due to Him,
and we tremble before Him as our [128] Creator. We worship the angels and
servants of God for His sake, as creatures and servants of God. An image
is a name and likeness of him it represents. Thus both by writing
and by engraving we are ever mindful of our Lord's sufferings, and of the
holy prophets in the old law and in the new.
St Leontius of Naples, in Cyprus, against the Jews-Book v.
Enter then heartily into our apology for the making of sacred images, so
that the mouths of foolish people speaking injustice may be closed. This
tradition comes from the old law, not from us. Listen to God's command
to Moses that he should make two cherubim wrought in metal to overshadow
the propitiatory. And again, God showed the temple to Ezechiel, with its
carved faces of lions, forms of palms and men from floor to ceiling.
The command is truly awe-inspiring. God, who enjoins Israel not to make
any graven thing, likeness or image of anything in heaven or on earth,
also orders Moses to make carved cherubim. God shows the temple to [129]
Ezechiel, full of images and sculptured likenesses of lions, palms, and
men. And Solomon, in conformity to the law, filled the temple with metal
figures of oxen, palms, and men, and God did not reproach him for it. Now,
if you wish to reproach me concerning images, you condemn God, who ordered
these things to be made that they might remind us of Himself.
The same, from the 3rd Book.
Again, atheists mock at us concerning the Holy Cross and the worship of
divine images, calling us idolators and worshippers of wooden gods. Now,
if I am a worshipper of wood, as you say, I am a worshipper of many, and,
if so, I should swear by many, and say, "By the gods," just as you at the
sight of one calf said, "These are thy gods, O Israel." You could not maintain
that Christian lips had used the expression, but the adulterous and unbelieving
synagogue is wont ever to cast infamy upon the all-wise Church of Christ.
The same.
We do not adore as gods the figures and [130] images of the saints. For
if it was the mere wood of the image that we adored as God, we should likewise
adore all wood, and not, as often happens, when the form grows faint, throw
the image into the fire. And again, as long as the wood remains in the
form of a cross, I adore it on account of Christ who was crucified upon
it. When it falls to pieces, I throw them into the fire. just as the man
who receives the sealed orders of the king and embraces the seal, looks
upon the dust and paper and wax as honourable in their reference to the
king's service, so we Christians, in worshipping the Cross, do not worship
the wood for itself, but seeing in it the impress and seal and figure of
Christ Himself, crucified through it and on it, we fall down and adore.
The same.
On this account I depict Christ and His sufferings in churches, and houses,
and public places, and images, on clothes, and store-houses, and in every
available place, so that ever before me, I may bear them in lasting memory,
and not be unmindful, as you are, of my Lord God. In worshipping the book
of the [131] law, you are not worshipping parchment or colour, but God's
words contained in it. So do I worship the image of Christ, neither wood
nor colouring for themselves. Adoring an inanimate figure of Christ through
the Cross, I seem to possess and to adore Christ. Jacob received Joseph's
cloak of many colours from his brothers who had sold him, (Gen. 37.32ff)
and he caressed it with tears as he gazed at it. He did not weep over the
cloak, but considered it a way of showing his love for Joseph and of embracing
, him. Thus do we Christians embrace with our lips the image of Christ,
or the apostles, or the martyrs, whilst in spirit we deem that we are embracing
Christ Himself or His martyr. As I have often said, the end in view must
always be considered in all greeting and worship. If you upbraid me because
I worship the wood of the Cross, why do you not upbraid Jacob for worshipping
on the point of Joseph's staff? (epi to akron thV rabdou).
It
is evident that it was not the wood he honoured by his worship, but Joseph,
as we adore Christ through the Cross. Abraham worshipped impious men who
sold him the cave, and bent [132] his knee to the ground, yet he did not
worship them as gods. And again, Jacob magnified impious Pharao and idolatrous
Esau seven times, yet not as God. How many salutations and worshippings
I have put before you, both natural and scriptural, which are not to be
condemned, and you no sooner see any one worshipping the image of Christ
or His Immaculate (panagiaV) Mother or a saint
than you are angry and blaspheme and call me an idolator. Have you no shame,
seeing me as you do day by day pulling down the temples of idols in the
whole world and raising churches to martyrs? If I worship idols, why do
I honour martyrs, their destroyers? If I glorify wood, as you say, why
do I honour the saints who have pulled down the wooden statues of demons?
If I glorify stones, how can I glorify the apostles who broke the stone
idols? If I honour the images of false gods, how can I praise and
glorify and keep the feast of the three children at Babylon who would not
worship the golden statue? How greatly foolish people err, and how blind
they are! What shamelessness is yours, 0 -Jew! what impiety! You sin indeed
against the [133] truth. Arise, O God, and justify Thy cause. judge and
justify us from people, not all people, but from senseless and hostile
people who constantly provoke Thee.
The same.
If, as I have often said, I worshipped wood and stone as God, I too, should
say to each, "Thou hast brought me forth." (Jer. 2.27) If I worship the
images of the saints, or rather the saints, and worship and reverence the
combats of the holy martyrs, how can you call these idols, senseless man?
For idols are likenesses of false gods and adulterers, murderers and luxurious
men, not of prophets or apostles. Listen whilst I take a telling and most
true example of Christian and heathen images. The Chaldeans in Babylon
had all sorts of musical instruments for the worship of idols who were
devils, and the children of Israel had brought musical instruments from
Jerusalem, which they hung upon the willow trees, and the instruments of
both lutes and stringed instruments and flutes gave forth their music,
these for the glory of God, the others for the service of devils. So must
you look upon images and [134] idols of heathens and Christians. Heathen
idols were for the glory and remembrance of the devil; Christian images
are for the glory of Christ, and of His apostles and martyrs and saints.
The same.
When, then, you see a Christian worshipping the Cross, know that his adoration
is not given to the wood, but to Christ Crucified. We might as well worship
all wood, as Israel worshipped woods and trees, saying, "Thou art my God,
and Thou hast brought me forth." It is not so with us. We keep in churches
and in our houses a remembrance and a representation of our Lord's sufferings
and of those who fought for Him, doing everything for our Lord's sake.
Once more. Tell me, O Jew, what law authorised Moses to worship Jethor,
his brother-in-law, and an idolator? Or Jacob to worship Pharao, and Abraham
the sons of Emmor? They were just men and prophets. Again, Daniel worshipped
the impious Nabuchodonosor. For if they so acted on account of life in
this world, why do you reproach [135] me for worshipping the holy memories
of the saints, whether in books or pictures, their combats and sufferings,
which arc a daily source of good to me, and will help me to lasting and
eternal life?
Saint Athanasius against the Arians.--Book iii.
The Son being of the same substance as the Father, He can justly say that
He has what the Father has. Hence it was fitting and proper that after
the words "I and the Father are one," (Jn. 10.30) he should add, "that
you may know that I am in the Father and the Father in Me." (Jn. 14.11)
He had already said the same thing. "He who sees Me sees the Father." (Jn.
14.9) There is one and the same mind in these three sayings. To know that
the Father and the Son are one is to know that he is in the Father and
the Father in the Son. The Godhead of the Son is the Godhead of the Father.
The man who receives this understands "that he who sees the Son sees the
Father." For the Godhead of the Father is seen in the Son. This will be
easier to understand from the example of the king's image which shows [136]
forth his form and likeness. The king is the likeness of his image. The
likeness of the king is indelibly impressed upon the image, so that any
one looking at the image sees the king, and again, any one looking at the
king recognises that the image is his likeness. Being an indelible likeness,
the image might answer a man, who expressed the wish to see the king after
contemplating it, by saying, "The king and I are one. I am in him and he
is in me. That which you see in me you see in him, and the man who looks
upon him looks at the same in me." He who worships the image worships the
king in it. The image is his form and likeness.
The same, to Antiochus the Ruler.
What do our adversaries say to these things, they who maintain that we
should not worship the effigies of the saints, which are preserved amongst
us for a remembrance of them.
St Ambrose of Milan, to the Emperor Gratian concerning the Incarnation
of God the Word.
God before flesh was made, and God in the [137] flesh. There is a fear
lest, abstracting the double principle of action and wisdom from Christ,
we should glorify a mutilated Christ. Now, is it possible to divide Christ
whilst we adore His Godhead and His flesh? Do we divide Him when we adore
at once the image of God and the Cross? God forbid.
St Cyril of Jerusalem, twelfth Instruction.
If you seek the cause of Christ's presence, go back to the first chapter
of Scripture. God made the world in six days, but the world was made for
man. The most brilliant sun glowing with light was made for man. And all
living things were created for our service, trees and flowers for our enjoyment.
All created things were beautiful, yet only man was the image of God. The
sun arose by command alone: man was moulded by the Divine Hand. "Let us
make man to our image and likeness." The wooden image of an earthly king
is honoured, how much more the rational image of God?
St John Chrysostom, on the Machabees.
The royal effigies are shown forth not only on [138] gold and silver,
and the most costly materials, but the royal form itself, even on copper.
The difference of matter does not affect the dignity of the character impressed,
nor does a viler material diminish the honour of what is great. The royal
figure is always a consecration; not lessened by matter, it exalts matter.
The same, against Julian the Apostate.--1st Book.
What does this new Nabuchodonosor want? He has not shown himself kinder
to us than Nabuchodonosor of old, whose furnace still pierces us through,
although we have escaped from its flames. Do not the shrines of saints
in churches, inviting the worship of the faithful, show forth the destruction
of the body?*
The same, on the Piscina.
Just as when the royal effigy and image is sent or carried into the city,
rulers and people go out to meet it with respect and reverence, not honouring
the wooden receptacle, or the waxen representation, but the person of the
king; so is it with created things.
[139] Severianus of the Gabali, on the Cross.
Fourth Homily.-"Moses struck the rock twice." Why twice?
If he was obeying God's commands, what need was there of striking a second
time? If without, not two, or ten, or a hundred strikings would have unlocked
nature: if it was simply God's work without the mystery of the Cross, one
striking, or nod, or word would have sufficed. But it is meant to be an
image of the Cross. Moses, the Scripture says, struck once and then again,
in the sign of the Cross, not for actual necessity, so that inanimate nature
might reverence the symbol. If in the king's absence his image supplies
his place, rulers worship, and festivals are held, and princes go out to
meet it, and people prostrate themselves, not looking at the material,
but at the figure of the king shown forth in representation not seen in
nature, how much more shall the image of the Eternal King break open the
heavens and the whole universe, not the rock alone.
[140] Jerome, Priest of Jerusalem, On The Holy Trinity.
As the Scripture nowhere enjoins you to worship the Cross, what makes you
adore it? Tell us, Jews and heathens, and all inquiring people.
Answer.-On this account, O slow and foolish of heart,
God allowed the people, who revered Him, to worship what was on earth,
the handiwork of man, so that they should not be able to reproach Christians
concerning the Cross and the worship of images. Now just as the Jew adored
the ark of the covenant, and the two carved cherubim of gold, and the two
tablets of Moses, although there is nowhere an order from God to worship
or revere them, so is it with Christians. We do not revere the Cross as
God; we show through it what we truly feel about the Crucified One.
Simeon of Mount Thaumastus on Images.
Possibly a contentious unbeliever will maintain that we worshipping images
in our churches are convicted of praying to lifeless idols. Far [141] be
it from us to do this. Faith* makes Christians,
and God, who cannot deceive, works miracles. We do not rest contented with
mere colouring. With the material picture before our eyes we see the invisible
God through the visible representation, and glorify Him as if present,
not as a God without reality, but as God who is the essence of being. Nor
are the saints whom we glorify fictitious. They are in being, and are living
with God; and their spirits being holy, they help, by the power of God,
those who deserve and need their assistance.
Athanasius, Archbishop of Antioch, to Simeon, Bishop of the Bostri,
on the Sabbath.
Just as in the king's absence his image is worshipped, so in his presence
it is extravagant to leave the original to pay homage to the image. It
is disregarded, because the original on whose account it is honoured is
present, but that is no reason for dishonouring it. It is much the
same, I think, with the shadow or letter of the law. The apostle [142]
calls it a figure. In so far as grace anticipated the reign of truth, the
saints were types, contemplating the truth as in a glass. When the promises
were fulfilled, it was no longer desirable to live according to types,
nor to follow them. In the presence of the realisation the type vanishes
into insignificance. Still they did not dishonour nor deride types; they
honoured them, and judged those who treated them with contumely impious,
and deserving of death and severe chastisement.
The same--3rd Homily.
A man worships the king's image for the honour due to the king, the image
itself being mere wax and paint.
St Athanasius of Mount Sinai on the New Sabbath, and on St Thomas the
Apostle.
Those who saw Christ in the flesh looked upon Him as a prophet. We, who
have not seen Him, have confessed Him from our childhood to be the great
and Almighty God Himself, the Creator of eternity, and splendour of the
Father. We listen with faith to His Gospel, as if we saw Christ Himself
speaking. [143] And receiving the pure treasure of His body, we believe
that Christ Himself is acting in us. And if we see only the image
of His divine form, as if looking down upon us from heaven, we prostrate
and adore. Great is now the faith of Christ.
From the Life of the Abbot Daniel, on Eulogius the Quarryman.
Then he went away dejected, and threw himself before an image of Our Lady,
and crying out, he said: "Lord, enable me to pay what I promised this man."
From the Life of St Mary of Egypt.
As I was weeping, I lifted up my eyes and saw the image of Our Lady,
and I said to her :--
"O Virgin, Mother of God (qeotoke despoina),
who didst give birth to God the Word, I know that it is neither fitting
nor seemly that one so defiled and so covered with guilt as I should look
up to thy image, O ever Virgin. It is fitting that I should be hated and
shunned by thy purity. Yet as He who was born of thee became man on purpose
to call sinners to [144] repentance, help me, for I have no other succour.
Let me also find an entrance. Do not refuse me a sight of the wood on which
God the Word, thy Son, suffered according to the flesh, who shed His own
precious blood for me. Grant, O Queen, that I may be admitted to worship
the sacred Cross, and I will promise thee as surety to the God whom thou
didst bring forth that I will keep myself ever undefiled, When I see the
Cross of thy Son, I will at once renounce the world and the things of the
world, and forthwith follow wherever thou shalt lead."
Saying this, taking faith's token as a conviction, encouraged by Our
Lady's clemency, I left that place where I had made my petition, and returned
again to join those who were entering the edifice. No one thrust me aside,
and no one prevented me from going into the church. Then I was seized with
horror and fear and trembling in all my limbs. Throwing myself on the ground,
and worshipping that holy floor, I came out, and went to her who had promised
to be my security. When I came to the place in which the agreement had
been signed, I knelt down before the [145] blessed Virgin, Mother of God,
and addressed her in these words :-
"O loving Queen (filagaqe despoina), thou
hast shown me thy goodness; thou didst not despise the petition of my unworthiness.
have seen glory which sinners do not see. Praise be to God who receives
the repentance of sinners through thee."
St Methodius, Bishop of the Patari (patarwn),
on
the Resurrection.
The images of earthly kings, even if they are not made of finest gold and
silver, command at once honour from all. As men are not honouring matter,
they do not choose the most precious from the less precious; they honour
the image, whether made of putty or of copper. A derider of either, whether
he shows contempt to the image of plaster or of gold, will be held to show
contempt to his lord and king. We make golden images of His angels, principalities,
or powers, for His honour and glory.