![]() |
Owasso Independent School Dist. NO. I-011 v. Falvo,122 S. Ct. 934 (2002) |
The Court held that "peer grading" of tests is not a violation
of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA).
The court found that the score on a student-graded assignment
is not part of an educational record maintained by the institution
and that peer graders are not "acting for" the institution.
'"Maintain" suggests FERPA records will be kept in a file in a school's record room or on a secure database, but student graders only handle assignments for a few moments as the teacher calls out the answers."
"Just as it would be awkward to say students are acting for the institution when following their teacher's instruction to take a quiz, it is equally awkward to say they are acting for the institution when following their teacher's direction to score it." |
Owasso Independent School Dist. NO. I-011 v. Falvo (00-1073
Argued November 27, 2001 -- Decided February 19, 2002
Opinion author: Kennedy
Teachers sometimes ask students, including respondent's children,
to score each other's tests, papers, and assignments as the teachers
explain the correct answers to the entire class. Claiming that
such "peer grading" violates the Family Educational Rights and
Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA or Act), respondent filed a 42 U.S.C.
sect. 1983 action against the school district and school officials
(petitioners). FERPA, inter alia, authorizes federal funds to be withheld from
school districts that permit students' "education records (or
personally identifiable information contained therein ...)" to
be released without their parents' written consent, 20 U.S.C.
sect. 1232g(b)(1); and defines education records as "records,
files, documents, and other materials" containing information
directly related to a student, which "are maintained by an educational
agency or institution or by a person acting for such agency or
institution," sect. 1232(a)(4)(A). In granting petitioners summary judgment, the District Court
held that grades put on papers by another student are not "education
records." The Tenth Circuit reversed, holding that FERPA provided
respondent with a cause of action enforceable under sect. 1983,
and finding that grades marked by students on each other's work are "education
records," so the very act of grading is an impermissible release
of information to the student grader.
Held: Peer grading does not violate FERPA. Pp. 3-9
(a) This Court assumes, without deciding, that FERPA provides private parties with a cause of action enforceable under sect. 1983. Though that question is left open, the Court has subject-matter jurisdiction here because respondent's federal claim is not so completely devoid of merit as not to involve a federal controversy. Pp. 3-4.
(b) Petitioners and the United States contend that education
records include only institutional records, e.g., student grade
point averages, standardized test scores, and records of disciplinary
actions. But respondent, adopting the Tenth Circuit's reasoning,
contends that an assignment satisfies sect. 1232(a)(4)(A)'s definition
as soon as another student grades it. That court determined that teachers' grade books and the grades
within are "maintained" by the teacher and thus covered by the Act. The court recognized that teachers do not maintain the grades
on individual student assignments until they have recorded them
in the grade books. It reasoned, however, that if the teacher
cannot disclose the grades once written in the grade book, it
makes no sense to permit disclosure immediately beforehand.
The court thus held that student graders maintain the grades until they are reported to the teacher. Two statutory indicators show that the Tenth Circuit erred. First, student papers are not, at that stage, "maintained" under
sect. 1232(a)(4)(A). That word's ordinary meaning is to preserve
or retain. Even assuming that a grade book is an education record,
the score on a student-graded assignment is not "contained therein,"
sect. 1232g(b)(1), until the teacher records it. "Maintain" suggests FERPA records will be kept in a file in
a school's record room or on a secure database, but student graders
only handle assignments for a few moments as the teacher calls
out the answers. The Tenth Circuit also erred in concluding that a student grader
is "a person acting for" an educational institution, sect. 1232g(a)(4)(A). That phrase
connotes agents of the school. Just as it would be awkward to say students are acting for the
institution when following their teacher's instruction to take
a quiz, it is equally awkward to say they are acting for the
institution when following their teacher's direction to score
it. That process can be as much a part of the assignment as taking
the test itself. This Court does not think FERPA prohibits such
educational techniques. Moreover, saying that students are acting for the teacher in
grading an assignment is different from saying they are acting
for an educational institution in maintaining it. Other FERPA sections--e.g., sect. 1232g(b)(4)(A), which requires
educational institutions to maintain a record of access kept
with the student's education records--support this Court's interpretation.
The instant holding is limited to the narrow point that, assuming
a teacher's grade book is an education record, grades on students'
papers are not covered by the Act at least until the teacher
has recorded them. The Court does not reach the broader question
whether the Act protects grades on individual assignments once
they are turned in to teachers. Pp. 4-9.
233 F.3d 1203, reversed and remanded.
Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist,
C. J., and Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, and Breyer,
JJ., joined.
Scalia, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.
School of Journalism and Communication