
- I. Consciousness, world
views, mentalities, Weltanschauungen, thoughts & feelings about the world
- A. Psychology, ethics, mores; national character
- B. Esthetics; art
- C. Religion; myth, spiritual life
- D. Theologies, philosophies, ideologies, science, law (formal thought about whats real & right)
- II. Institutions,
formal structures of governance, administration, and management
- A. Churches, censors, law courts, schools, the media
[institutions variously responsible for I. above]
- 1. Religious officials [IE=religious organizations & officers| EG =Pope,
Patriarch, Rabbi, Mosque, Temple, Monastery, Shaman]
- 2. Censorship
- 3. Judges
- 4. Schools, universities, academies
- 5. Publishers, Journalists, broadcast networks, "public
intellectuals", the media (including "entertainment")
- B. The state (central, sovereign authority)
- 1. Embassies and military
- 2. Domestic law enforcement (police)
- 3. Legislation
- 4. Budget income (EG= Plunder, tribute, tithes, taxes,
state enterprises and properties) [cf. IV below]
- 5. Budget expenditure (EG=Procurement (esp. military procurement), welfare
- C. Other economic institutions [CF=IV.B below]
- 1. finance, treasuries, banks
- 2. businesses, corporations
- III. Social structure; classes
[CF=Dozen Categories], large, replicated, often
hierarchical formations
- A. Tight social hierarchies = social estates with strict distinctions, e.g.,
aristocrats & commoners
- B. Looser but very real social classes = the rich, the poor, bourgeoisie and proletariat
- C. Labor (bound labor, servile labor, wage labor, etc.)
- D. Indigenous peoples and ethnic "minorities"
- E. Women; gender issues
- F. Families (extended and nuclear)
- G. "Civil society" [ID] (e.g., "public", leisure, sports)
- IV. Economy, production
and distribution of things of value [CF=II.B.4 above]
- A. Agriculture (villages, farms, "feudalism", latifundia estates, corporate farming)
- B. Industrialization (mercantilism, laissez-faire, trans-national corporatism,
managerialism) [CF=II.B.4.e above]
- C. Markets, trade
- V. Geography, topography, climate, flora & fauna [including
populations, demographic data
- A. Rural periphery and urban metropolis
- A. Material culture
- B. The "ecosystem" (i.e., the physical and biological environment)
Here at point "V", vertical points "I". through "IV" flatten out. In this way, Geography can be thought of as a lateral platform or a
geo-physical plain (GEOGRAPHY) on which all events
embraced within points "I" through "IV" take place
Particularly it is here in the realm of point "V. Geography" that the
diplomatic/military activities of centralized government (II.B above) concentrate,
EG= frontier and imperialist expansion.
Points "IV. Economy" and "V. Geography" can also be thought to bend around to touch mentalities
at the top of the list. As Economy digs into the material culture of daily life
and adjusts to its environment, it attaches itself to the upper reaches of the
TAXONOMY, to ways of seeing the world. Daily behavior, customary "going about"
links intimately with the fluid and complex dynamics of human consciousness in
folk behavior, customs, culture, ritual, and beliefs, but also in doctrines and
ideologies
Taken together, sections "II. III and IV" describe the way peoples
organize themselves or are organized by others or by circumstances to manage (1) production,
(2) distribution and (3) consumption of
the things they need and value
The whole TAXONOMY, points "I" through "V", could be called
the economy if we seek to understand the concept not simply as income and expenditure data (as in
micro-economics) or stock-market averages (as in financial profit centered
concepts) but as functioning people in relationship to actual conceptual,
institutional, social and physical environments. We might need to return to the
original written effort to explain "economy", Hesiod's Works and Days
[ID], in order to restore a
fuller sense of the term
Considered together,
were the subject matter in that grand 18th- and 19th-century tradition called "political-economy"
[LOOP]
Political-economy seeks to understand how civilizations function, in the largest possible frame of critical or
analytical understanding
THE TAXONOMY IS A MOBILE, EVEN KALEIDOSCOPIC, BEAST
This suggestive organizational TAXONOMY is dynamic with respect to the interior relationships up and down the
deceptively stiff-looking outline. The taxonomic categories are themselves fluid and
intertwined with one another. Remember these
cautionary and suggestive words about
"taxonomies".
For example, sometimes it appears that everyday life decides the way people think,
while at others it appears that the way people think determines their daily life.
Arguments about crime and poverty, for example, often hang on this point. Criminality and
poverty are thought by some to be created by circumstances of everyday life. Others think
criminality and poverty are created by character traits of the criminals and the poor
themselves, and therefore everyday life circumstances of criminals or dangerous classes of
people follow from the way they think or are the result of character traits.
Historians might often consider each possibility, and they also like to ask if these
situations are the same for all people, up and down the social hierarchy, or in many
different places over the globe, or in all periods of historical time.
Of course, there is change over historical time. Chronology
works as if our seemingly stable TAXONOMY rolled constantly to the right. Nothing is fixed, up and
down the four sections or from geographic place to place, and now we are
reminded of the horizontal movement of the whole loose structure over time.
Furthermore, we notice in the record of historical experience that various
sections and subsections of the taxonomy above seem to roll forward in time at widely
different and irregular speeds. Some aspects of human experience seem to
change quickly, then not at all, then very slowly, while others seem never to
change. We sometimes detect "retrograde motion". Clothing styles, technology,
etc., seem very fluid, while certain basic values seem stable. Is there really a
significant history of "murder"? of the emotion "love"? Yet the changing
and the apparently changeless dimensions of historical experience are all
intertwined. And the whole package is unquestionably rolling forward in time. Such is the four dimensional
kaleidoscope of history.
But what sets this squirming kaleidoscope in motion? LOOP back to webpage "Interests"

ALTERNATE + RIGHT ARROW TO RETURN TO WHERE YOU CAME FROM
KIMBALL FILES HOME PAGE
|
|
|
|
|
|