Requirements *** Grading policy *** Contact

INTRODUCTION: The Origins of Humanism and the idea of Posthumanism

Seminar # 1 January 9

Primary readings:

Francis Petrarch, Familiar Letters, I, 1; I, 47; XXI, 12.

Francis Petrarch, Letters of Old Age, II, 1.

Ronald G. Witt’s "Petrarch, Father of Humanism?" in In the Footsteps of the Ancients. The Origins of Humanism from Lovato to Bruni, 2000), pp.230-291.

Secondary readings:

Francis Fukuyama, "Being Human," in Our Posthuman Future. Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution (2002), pp.105-177.

PART ONE: The Human as imago Dei

Lecture # 1 January 14: Knight Library Media Services, Studio A at 4:00: Pier Cesare Bori,: "The image of God from Pico and Las Casas to Locke"

Seminar # 2 January 16

Primary readings:

- Bartolomé de Las Casas, A Brief Account of the Destruction of the Indies (1552) http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/20321

Secondary readings:
- Pier Cesare Bori, Pluralità delle vie. Alle origini del Discorso sulla dignità umana di Pico della Mirandola. Milano: Feltrinelli, 2000.

-Roger Ruston, "Freedom and the Gospel," "Defender of the Indians", in Human Rights and the Image of God. London: SCM Press, 2004, pp.119-156.

Seminar # 3 January 23

Primary readings:

Francisco De Vitoria (c. 1480 or 1483 –1546), De Indis De Jure Belli (1532). http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/De_Indis_De_Jure_Belli

Secondary readings:

Roger Ruston, "Salamanca: Francisco de Vitoria," in Human Rights and the Image of God (2004), pp.65-98.

PART TWO: Philosophical Interpretations of Humanism and the Problem of History

Seminar # 4 January 30

-Jean Paul Sartre, Existentialism is a Humanism, New Haven-London: Yale UP, 2007, pp. 17-54

- Martin Heidegger, "Letter on Humanism," in Id. Basic Writings, David Farrell Krell (Ed.). San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1993, pp.213-265

Seminar # 5 February 6

Walter Mignolo,"The colonization of memory" in The darker side of the Renaissance : literacy, territoriality, and colonization. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, c1995, pp.123-216. *This book is on reserve.

Peter Kuon (Universität Salzburg, Österreich), Humanism and Posthumanism. Anthropological Reflections in the Texts from the Survivors of the Nazi Concentration Camps.

Seminar # 6 February 13
Lecture # 2 February 13: Claudia Alvares (Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades Tecnologias, Escola de Comunicação, Artes e Tecnologias da Informação, Lisboa, Portugal), 'Rethinking Humanism in a Post-Colonial Context'

Claudia Alvarez. Humanism after Colonialism. Oxford-Bern_Bruxelles-Frankfurt am Main-New York-Wien: Peter Lang, 2006, second,(Slavery and the New World: What is Human?), third (On White
Mythologies: The Antihumanist Argument), and the Epilogue *This book is on reserve.

Emmanuel Levinas, Humanism of the Other. Urbana and Chicago: Illinois UP, 2006, pp.1-69. *This book is on reserve.

PART THREE: Renaissance Posthumanism: The crisis of human deificatio

Seminar # 7 February 20

Primary readings:

- Leon Battista Alberti, "Fate and Fortune," "The Dream" and in Dinner Pieces. Binghamton, N.Y. : Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies in conjuction with the Renaissance Society of America, 1987, pp. 23-27; 66-69.

-Giordano Bruno, The Ash Wednesday Supper. The Hague : Mouton, 1975.

Secondary readings:

Nuccio’s Ordine, Giordano Bruno and the philosophy of the ass. New Haven: Yale University Press, c1996

Seminar # 8 February 27

Primary readings:

Giambattista Vico, Humanism and the Renaissaince. Vico’s interpretation of Humanism and Renaissance. We will read Vico’s On the Heroic Mind and excerpts from his New Science.

Secondary readings:

Ernesto Grassi, Heidegger and the question of Renaissance humanism. Binghamton, N.Y. : Center for Medieval & Early Renaissance Studies, 1983, pp.9-30; 49-76.

Giuseppe Mazzotta’s Cosmopoiesis: The Renaissance Experiment. Toronto : University of Toronto Press, 2001, pp. XI-XVI.

PART FOUR: A Posthuman Literature and Philosophy?

Lecture # 3 March 3: Knight Library Media Services, Studio A at 4:00: Christopher Celenza (Johns Hopkins University), "What Does it Mean to be Human? The Classical Tradition and the Problem of Humanity"

Seminar # 9 March 5

Robert Pepperell "What is Posthumanism;" "The Posthuman Manifesto," in The Posthuman Condition. Conscousness beyond the brain. Bristol [Eng.] ; Portland, Or.: Intellect, 2003, pp.247-291. Previous ed.: 1995 has the title: The Post-human condition.

http://www.robertpepperell.com/post-human.htm [This site accompanies the new edition of Robert Pepperell's book, The Posthuman Condition: Consciousness beyond the brain, first
published in 1995 and now completely revised. Included here are a
number of posthuman references, resources and additional materials
to supplement the book].

N. Katherine Hayles. "The semiotics of virtuality: mapping the Posthuman;" "Conclusion: what does it mean to be Posthuman," in How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics, 1999, pp.247-291.

Donna Haraway, "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century;" , "Situated Knowledges", in Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York; Routledge, 1991), pp.149-181 [http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Haraway/CyborgManifesto.html}

CONCLUSION

Seminar # 10 March 12

Presentations

Requirements

1) Readings accompanied by weekly written electronic forums which provide an opportunity for analysis and discussion (10%)

2) Participation in class and in working groups. This include writing in the Wiki associated to the course one page weekly report on the meetings of the groups outside the classroom (20%)

3) Two papers (5 pages each for undergraduate and 10 pages each for graduate (40%)

4) One presentation (10%)

GRADING POLICY FOR THE ESSAY

Scores

• Excellent Essay:             A- (90-93) A (94-97) A+ (98-100).

• Good Essay:                         B- (80-83) B (84-87) B+ (88-89).

• Satisfactory Essay:             C- (70-73) C (74-77) C+ (78-79)

Criteria for each category

-The thesis is clear and developed logically and coherently, using vivid and concrete detail and appropriate evidence to back up the argument (20%);

-This essay makes a fluid, reasoned, well-supported argument (10%);

-It includes pertinent quotations from multiple sources (10%)

-Each paragraph is coherent and begins with a topic sentence that presents a point of your argument and relates to your thesis (10%);

-It is well-organized: it includes an introduction, a body and a conclusion, and features smooth transitions (10%)

-Evidences varied sentence structure, fresh diction, strong voice, appropriate tone, and something memorable and original (5);

-This writing interests its audience in what you have to say. It invites reading (10%);

-There are only insignificant grammatical and mechanical errors, if any (5%)

• Unsatisfactory Essay (D-,D, D+). The writing detracts from the essay’s thesis and may make reading difficult. The essay will have a thesis that is insufficiently supported with specific detail. The thesis itself may not be suitable to the audience or the scope of the assignment, or the thesis and argument of the essay may not be in agreement. Organization may be sketchy or inadequate. There are such errors in grammar, mechanics, logic, sentence structure, or organization that the controlling idea of the essay is obscured rather than clarified, or the ideas themselves lack careful thought. The essay may not be the assigned length.

• Unacceptable Essay (F). This essay has no discernible thesis and thus no structure stemming from it. Serious grammatical and mechanical errors abound. There is no attempt to identify or reach an audience with this writing. Unacceptable writing also includes writing that is plagiarized in part or as a whole.

CONTACT

maxiloll@uoregon.edu

It is easier to communicate with me via e-mail than by telephone: You may write me an email with any questions you may have about the course. Office hours: H (2:00-4:00)

TOP OF THE PAGE