Privacy "Dean Prosser, noted that 'invasion of the right of privacy' mixed four distinct wrongs, related not by similarity of defendants' acts but only by "the interest of the individual in leading, to some reasonable extent, a secluded and private life, free from the prying eyes, ears and publications of others." J. Hans Linde in Anderson v. Fisher Broadcasting Cos., 300 Ore. 452, 712 .2d 803, 12 Media L. Rep. 1604 (Or. 1986) APPROPRIATION COMMERCIAL USE OF NAME OR LIKENESS WITHOUT CONSENT INTRUSION PHYSICAL INTRUSION REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY. PUBLICATION OF PRIVATE FACTS COMMON LAW PUBLICITY OF PRIVATE, HIGHLY OFFENSIVE AND NOT NEWSWORTHY TRUE FACTS. OREGON INFORMATION GATHERED OR PUBLISHED IN A MANNER OR FOR A PURPOSE WRONGFUL BEYOND THE UNCONSENTED PUBLICATION FALSE LIGHT PLAINTIFF MUST SHOW: The publication leaves a false impression The publication is highly offensive Actual malice False Facts [some jurisdictions] Also see: Privacy powerpoint on Blackboard.