How does gravity work?

Force of gravity

Not-so-free fall

Terminal velocity

Joke of the day.

Work and Energy

What about Energy?

Two Types of Mechanical Energy

Work & Mechanical Energy

Conservation of Energy

Power

How does gravity work?

Let's observe the effect of "gravity" on a softball with the following experimental setup:

Question: What happens when the board is pulled out from under the softball?

Answer: Duh, let me guess.....

Question: So, HOW is the ball moving towards the ground?

Time for an Interactive Lecture Demonstration

Question: If the ball is accelerating, what is causing the acceleration?

Answer: The "force of gravity," the attraction between the Earth and the softball, is causing the ball to accelerate downwards.

Question: Is the "force of gravity" the same for lighter or heavier (less or more massive) objects of a similar shape?

      Try this experiment:

Answer: OK, so they both hit at the same time (after suitable modification). That means that they both accelerated in an identical manner, speeding up towards the table at the same rate.

The Force of Gravity or... Sir Isaac Newton to the rescue!

At the surface of the Earth*:

(* technically-speaking, g is observed to vary slightly at different places on Earth. This is because, in part, the surface of the Earth is different distances from its center because of 'equitorial bulge,' mountains, etc. It is also true that differences in the composition of the Earth's crust cause very small changes in 'g.' Geophysicists use careful measurements of 'g' to map differences in structure in the crust.)

The gravitational force that the earth exerts on an object is proportional to the object's mass. So in free fall an object's acceleration is: 

 

Notice that a doesn't depend on mass.

Not-so-Free Fall

or... Was Aristotle some kind of idiot or what?

What is our every day experience with falling things? 

Take paper for instance:

Terminal Velocity (no, not the movie with Charlie Sheen)

 Again, what is our every day experience with falling things? The net force acting on a falling object, Fnet, depends on 'gravity' (called W, below), but also on something else we call 'air resistance' (R, below)

This changes (reduces the magnitude of) the acceleration of a falling object. We can substitute into above to get:

Interestingly, air resistance (R, above) depends on velocity. It is zero when an object is at rest and just about to fall. It grows over time as the object falls. Indeed, with sufficient room to fall it will increase until it exactly balances the weight of an object (W, above).

Imagine putting your hand out the window of a car as it accelerates.  Certainly the faster the car goes the more force the air exerts on your hand.  This is because air resistance is proportional to velocity. 

We can write it as, R = bv, where b is a number that depends on the how much air an object has to move through (something to do with its shape).

Terminal velocity is reached when Fnet = 0, or when W = R. What can we say about an object's acceleration and velocity when it has reached terminal velocity?

We can solve for terminal velocity in terms of a falling object's mass (m), g, and something called b, which depends on an object's shape:

that's weight divided by "shape

Notice that v DOES depend on an object's mass. So Aristotle wasn't really so dumb. Massive things do fall to Earth faster when air resistance is important.

Work and Energy

Consider the following simple experiment (Simple for telepathy man, maybe!):
    1. While tele-man is lifting the book he is doing work on the book (how many double-stuff ding-dongs need he eat to lift the book.....?). He is applying a force on the book over a distance of one meter.

        To make the book move upwards (from rest), he must first apply a force slightly greater than that of gravity, which is pulling down on the book. Over the entire motion of the book the net force he applies must be equal to the book's weight.

    2. While holding the book still, tele-man is doing no work on the book.

        Sure he is telekinetically applying a force, but the book isn't moving in the direction of the force. Hence there is no force applied over a distance.... no work being done.

    3. When the book is moving at a constant velocity to the right tele-man IS doing work on the book. But NOT in the up-down direction. Not only that, but after the book has stopped again, the net work done on the book is zero.

Sure, he may have to apply a force upwards to keep the book from dropping in response to the force of gravity, but that force is perpendicular to the direction the book is moving. So it doesn't count. Before and after moving the book horizontally it is still, and thus hasn't gained any kinetic energy.

    Actually, to start the book moving and to stop it at the end does require application of some force in, and then opposite, the direction of motion. While it is moving at a constant velocity tele-man IS doing work on the book, but so is air resistance. So the net work on the book is zero during that part of its motion, positive when the book is starting to move horizontally, and negative when the book is stopped, so that the total work done on the book moving horizontally is zero.

Time for a demonstration!

Does it matter how long tele-man takes to lift the book 1m?

Does the book gain more or less energy if the book is lifted faster or slower?

Remember, work is defined as force applied over a distance, NOT force applied over time.

Now what about energy?

A definition used by physicists to describe the energy of simple objects is expressed in terms of work:

Definition: Energy is the capacity to do work.

Energy is a description of the capacity to do work, but what "has" energy and what does the work?

In lifting the book, we can say that the book has gained energy. Energy is then a property of the book, just like its mass, velocity, etc.

If we call the book a system, instead of simple object, then a system boundary surrounds the book. Energy describes what is inside the system boundary (the book), while work is done on or by the book across the system (book's) boundary.
Energy involving the position of objects or their motion is called Mechanical Energy.

Two types of mechanical energy: kinetic and potential


Kinetic energy:
(KE) describes a property of a moving object, and has been found to be proportional to an object's mass and the square of its velocity, as in:

Even if an object has a negative velocity, it has positive kinetic energy.

Kinetic energy (KE) is energy in motion. If a car is in motion, it has the capacity to do work... by running into something! So KE fits our definition for energy.

GPE = force times displacement = (m x g) x h (units are N-m = J)
where m is the mass (kg), g is the (constant) acceleration of gravity at the Earth's surface (9.8 m/s2), and h is the height (m). Note that J stands for Joule, a unit of energy.

Note that an object's potential energy always relates to another object, or other objects. The GPE of a raised book is in relation to the Earth.

Telepathy-man loses his concentration.

Work & Mechanical Energy

When net work on or by something, its mechanical energy changes. When that something does work on another object (e.g., in a collision), it loses mechanical energy.

In general, then, work serves to change the energy of an object. Work is not energy, but a way of transfering energy from one object to another. Work is done on or by an object. Energy describes the state of the object, but that can be the state relative to another object.

Conservation of Energy

Energy exists in many forms: gravitational potential energy, kinetic energy, heat energy, chemical potential energy, electrical potential energy, etc. It is never created nor destroyed. It simply changes forms.
The total amount of energy never changes.
Taken together, these two precepts are known as conservation of energy.

Time for a death-defying demonstration!

POWER

I have the Power!
Power to the people!
Fight the Power!
Girl Power!
Power nap!
PowerBar
Power-ade
Power is another word, like work and energy, that gets used (overused) with different meanings in everyday life. In physics we define power this way…
power = work done / time interval
Since we know that work = force x distance we can rewrite the definition of power this way.
power = force x distance / time
You should recognize distance/time as velocity. So now we see that a powerful machine is both strong (large force) and fast (large velocity). So a football linebacker could be called powerful. A pick-up truck and a sports car can each be powerful. The truck is geared more towards force and the sports car is geared more towards speed. If you drive either of these types of vehicles you will find you spend more time at the gas station than your friend in their low power VW bug does. You might also notice that the linebacker spends more time at the cafeteria!
What is wrong here?

Previous Lecture Next Lecture Back to Course Page.